TY - JOUR

T1 - The Right to Transparency in Public Governance

T2 - Freedom of Information and the Use of Artificial Intelligence by Public Agencies

AU - Olsen, Henrik Palmer

AU - Hildebrandt, Thomas Troels

AU - Wiesener, Cornelius

AU - Larsen, Matthias Smed

AU - Ammitzbøll Flügge, Asbjørn William

N1 - Publisher Copyright: Copyright © 2024 held by the owner/author(s).

PY - 2024/3/12

Y1 - 2024/3/12

N2 - What information should and can be transparent for artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms? This article examines the socio- technical and legal perspectives of transparency in relation to algorithmic decision-making in public administration. We show how transparency in AI can be understood in light of the various technologies and the challenges one may encounter. Despite some first steps in that direction, there exists so far no mature standard for documenting AI models. From a legal perspective, this article examined the applicable freedom of information (FOI) regimes across different jurisdictions, with a particular focus on Denmark and other Scandinavian countries. Despite notable differences, our findings show that the FOI regimes generally only grant access to existing documents, and that access can be denied on the basis of the wide proprietary interests and internal documents exemptions. This is why we ultimately conclude that the European data-protection framework and the proposed EU AI Act -with their far-reaching duties to document the functioning of AI systems -provide promising new avenues for research and insights into transparency in AI.

AB - What information should and can be transparent for artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms? This article examines the socio- technical and legal perspectives of transparency in relation to algorithmic decision-making in public administration. We show how transparency in AI can be understood in light of the various technologies and the challenges one may encounter. Despite some first steps in that direction, there exists so far no mature standard for documenting AI models. From a legal perspective, this article examined the applicable freedom of information (FOI) regimes across different jurisdictions, with a particular focus on Denmark and other Scandinavian countries. Despite notable differences, our findings show that the FOI regimes generally only grant access to existing documents, and that access can be denied on the basis of the wide proprietary interests and internal documents exemptions. This is why we ultimately conclude that the European data-protection framework and the proposed EU AI Act -with their far-reaching duties to document the functioning of AI systems -provide promising new avenues for research and insights into transparency in AI.

KW - administrative decision-making

KW - algorithm

KW - freedom of information

KW - Transparency

U2 - 10.1145/3632753

DO - 10.1145/3632753

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85187807869

VL - 5

JO - Digital Government: Research and Practice

JF - Digital Government: Research and Practice

SN - 2639-0175

IS - 1

M1 - 8

ER -