Higher serum concentrations of PFAS among pesticide exposed female greenhouse workers

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Dokumenter

  • Fulltext

    Forlagets udgivne version, 384 KB, PDF-dokument

Background
Long-chained poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have been used in pesticide formulations but their potential impact on human PFAS exposure has not been addressed.

Objectives
To investigate if occupationally pesticide exposed female greenhouse workers in Denmark had higher serum concentrations of PFAS than a comparable background population.

Methods
Serum samples collected between 1996 and 2001 from 181 pregnant greenhouse workers and a contemporary urban population of 48 pregnant women were analyzed for eight PFAS: perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), perfluorohexane sulfonic acid (PFHxS), perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA), perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA), perfluorooctane sulfonamide (FOSA), N-methyl perfluorooctane sulfonamido acetic acid (N-MeFOSAA), and N-ethyl perfluorooctane sulfonamido acetic acid (N-EtFOSAA).

Results
The concentrations of PFOA, PFOS, and the PFOS precursors N-MeFOSAA, N-EtFOSAA, and FOSA were higher, and PFHxS was lower, among greenhouse workers than the comparison population. After adjusting for age and parity, serum concentrations of N-MeFOSAA, N-EtFOSAA, and FOSA were 2-to-3-fold higher, and the major PFAS in serum, PFOS and PFOA, were 30–50 % higher among the greenhouse workers.

Conclusion
Higher serum concentrations of some legacy PFAS among female greenhouse workers indicate that exposure to pesticides is a potential pathway of exposure. Although PFAS use in pesticide applications may appear to be a minor source of exposure for the general population, this pathway deserves attention in risk assessment.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummer114292
TidsskriftInternational Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health
Vol/bind255
Antal sider5
ISSN1438-4639
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2024

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
The study was supported by the Danish Environmental Protection Agency (project number 669-00102 ) and The Danish Council for Strategic Research , Program Commission on Health, Food and Welfare (project number 2101-08-0058 ). PG is supported by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences ( ES027706 ).

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors

ID: 382384381