GRADE pearls and pitfalls - Part 1: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Review › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

GRADE pearls and pitfalls - Part 1 : Systematic reviews and meta-analyses. / Al Duhailib, Zainab; Granholm, Anders; Alhazzani, Waleed; Oczkowski, Simon; Belley-Cote, Emilie; Møller, Morten Hylander.

I: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2024.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Review › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Al Duhailib, Z, Granholm, A, Alhazzani, W, Oczkowski, S, Belley-Cote, E & Møller, MH 2024, 'GRADE pearls and pitfalls - Part 1: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses', Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14386

APA

Al Duhailib, Z., Granholm, A., Alhazzani, W., Oczkowski, S., Belley-Cote, E., & Møller, M. H. (2024). GRADE pearls and pitfalls - Part 1: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14386

Vancouver

Al Duhailib Z, Granholm A, Alhazzani W, Oczkowski S, Belley-Cote E, Møller MH. GRADE pearls and pitfalls - Part 1: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14386

Author

Al Duhailib, Zainab ; Granholm, Anders ; Alhazzani, Waleed ; Oczkowski, Simon ; Belley-Cote, Emilie ; Møller, Morten Hylander. / GRADE pearls and pitfalls - Part 1 : Systematic reviews and meta-analyses. I: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2024.

Bibtex

@article{a580276da6234f0d9fad35187fc83cd4,
title = "GRADE pearls and pitfalls - Part 1: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses",
abstract = "Background: The Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach is used to assess the certainty of evidence in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Methods: We describe how the GRADE approach is used in systematic reviews and meta-analyses, including key points and examples. This overview is aimed at clinicians and researchers who are, or plan to be, involved in the development or assessment of systematic reviews with meta-analyses using GRADE. Results: We outline how the certainty of evidence is assessed, how the evidence is summarized using GRADE evidence profiles or summary of findings tables, how the results are communicated, and we discuss challenges, advantages, and disadvantages with using GRADE. Conclusions: This overview aims to provide an overview of how GRADE is used in systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and may be used by systematic review developers, methodologists, and evidence end-users.",
keywords = "GRADE, meta-analyses, systematic reviews",
author = "{Al Duhailib}, Zainab and Anders Granholm and Waleed Alhazzani and Simon Oczkowski and Emilie Belley-Cote and M{\o}ller, {Morten Hylander}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 The Authors. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation.",
year = "2024",
doi = "10.1111/aas.14386",
language = "English",
journal = "Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica",
issn = "0001-5172",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - GRADE pearls and pitfalls - Part 1

T2 - Systematic reviews and meta-analyses

AU - Al Duhailib, Zainab

AU - Granholm, Anders

AU - Alhazzani, Waleed

AU - Oczkowski, Simon

AU - Belley-Cote, Emilie

AU - Møller, Morten Hylander

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 The Authors. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation.

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - Background: The Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach is used to assess the certainty of evidence in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Methods: We describe how the GRADE approach is used in systematic reviews and meta-analyses, including key points and examples. This overview is aimed at clinicians and researchers who are, or plan to be, involved in the development or assessment of systematic reviews with meta-analyses using GRADE. Results: We outline how the certainty of evidence is assessed, how the evidence is summarized using GRADE evidence profiles or summary of findings tables, how the results are communicated, and we discuss challenges, advantages, and disadvantages with using GRADE. Conclusions: This overview aims to provide an overview of how GRADE is used in systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and may be used by systematic review developers, methodologists, and evidence end-users.

AB - Background: The Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach is used to assess the certainty of evidence in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Methods: We describe how the GRADE approach is used in systematic reviews and meta-analyses, including key points and examples. This overview is aimed at clinicians and researchers who are, or plan to be, involved in the development or assessment of systematic reviews with meta-analyses using GRADE. Results: We outline how the certainty of evidence is assessed, how the evidence is summarized using GRADE evidence profiles or summary of findings tables, how the results are communicated, and we discuss challenges, advantages, and disadvantages with using GRADE. Conclusions: This overview aims to provide an overview of how GRADE is used in systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and may be used by systematic review developers, methodologists, and evidence end-users.

KW - GRADE

KW - meta-analyses

KW - systematic reviews

U2 - 10.1111/aas.14386

DO - 10.1111/aas.14386

M3 - Review

C2 - 38351600

AN - SCOPUS:85185513003

JO - Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

JF - Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

SN - 0001-5172

ER -

ID: 386606602