Studying the politics of small states: A response to Baker, Dookeran and Jugl
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research
Documents
- Full Text
503 KB, PDF document
As co-editors of the Handbook on the politics of small states, we reflect briefly
on the insightful arguments of Kerryn Baker, Winston Dookeran and Marlene Jugl, which are, in their turn, inspired by a critical reading of our book. We revisit our working and pragmatic definition of small states, repropose justifications for their study, and tentatively explore the relatively underutilised merits of a comparative methodology. These considerations help to once again address (1) why we should study the politics of small states, (2) how to study it, and (3) what do we actually focus on when we study small state politics.
on the insightful arguments of Kerryn Baker, Winston Dookeran and Marlene Jugl, which are, in their turn, inspired by a critical reading of our book. We revisit our working and pragmatic definition of small states, repropose justifications for their study, and tentatively explore the relatively underutilised merits of a comparative methodology. These considerations help to once again address (1) why we should study the politics of small states, (2) how to study it, and (3) what do we actually focus on when we study small state politics.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Small States and Territories |
Volume | 5 |
Issue number | 1 |
Pages (from-to) | 195-200 |
Number of pages | 6 |
ISSN | 2616-8006 |
Publication status | Published - 2022 |
- Faculty of Social Sciences
Research areas
Links
- https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/94152
Final published version
Number of downloads are based on statistics from Google Scholar and www.ku.dk
No data available
ID: 304716283