Risk factors for diagnostic delay in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Risk factors for diagnostic delay in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. / Hoyer, Nils; Prior, Thomas Skovhus; Bendstrup, Elisabeth; Wilcke, Torgny; Shaker, Saher Burhan.

I: Respiratory research, Bind 20, 103, 05.2019.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Hoyer, N, Prior, TS, Bendstrup, E, Wilcke, T & Shaker, SB 2019, 'Risk factors for diagnostic delay in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis', Respiratory research, bind 20, 103. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-019-1076-0

APA

Hoyer, N., Prior, T. S., Bendstrup, E., Wilcke, T., & Shaker, S. B. (2019). Risk factors for diagnostic delay in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respiratory research, 20, [103]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-019-1076-0

Vancouver

Hoyer N, Prior TS, Bendstrup E, Wilcke T, Shaker SB. Risk factors for diagnostic delay in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respiratory research. 2019 maj;20. 103. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-019-1076-0

Author

Hoyer, Nils ; Prior, Thomas Skovhus ; Bendstrup, Elisabeth ; Wilcke, Torgny ; Shaker, Saher Burhan. / Risk factors for diagnostic delay in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. I: Respiratory research. 2019 ; Bind 20.

Bibtex

@article{55c4d111d04b4c3b822bc3266a7d1ba7,
title = "Risk factors for diagnostic delay in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis",
abstract = "Background: Surveys and retrospective studies of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) have shown a significant diagnostic delay. However, the causes and risk factors for this delay are not known. Methods: Dates at six time points before the IPF diagnosis (onset of symptoms, first contact to a general practitioner, first hospital contact, referral to an interstitial lung disease (ILD) centre, first visit at an ILD centre, and final diagnosis) were recorded in a multicentre cohort of 204 incident IPF patients. Based on these dates, the delay was divided into specific patient-related and healthcare-related delays. Demographic and clinical data were used to determine risk factors for a prolonged delay, using multivariate negative binomial regression analysis. Results: The median diagnostic delay was 2.1 years (IQR: 0.9-5.0), mainly attributable to the patients, general practitioners and community hospitals. Male sex was a risk factor for patient delay (IRR: 3.84, 95% CI: 1.17-11.36, p = 0.006) and old age was a risk factor for healthcare delay (IRR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.06, p = 0.004). The total delay was prolonged in previous users of inhalation therapy (IRR: 1.99, 95% CI: 1.40-2.88, p < 0.0001) but not in patients with airway obstruction. Misdiagnosis of respiratory symptoms was reported by 41% of all patients. Conclusion: Despite increased awareness of IPF, the diagnostic delay is still 2.1 years. Male sex, older age and treatment attempts for alternative diagnoses are risk factors for a delayed diagnosis of IPF. Efforts to reduce the diagnostic delay should focus on these risk factors. Trial registration: This study was registered at http://clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02772549) on May 10, 2016.",
keywords = "Cohort, Delay, Diagnosis, IPF, Observational",
author = "Nils Hoyer and Prior, {Thomas Skovhus} and Elisabeth Bendstrup and Torgny Wilcke and Shaker, {Saher Burhan}",
year = "2019",
month = may,
doi = "10.1186/s12931-019-1076-0",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
journal = "Respiratory Research (Print)",
issn = "1465-9921",
publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Risk factors for diagnostic delay in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

AU - Hoyer, Nils

AU - Prior, Thomas Skovhus

AU - Bendstrup, Elisabeth

AU - Wilcke, Torgny

AU - Shaker, Saher Burhan

PY - 2019/5

Y1 - 2019/5

N2 - Background: Surveys and retrospective studies of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) have shown a significant diagnostic delay. However, the causes and risk factors for this delay are not known. Methods: Dates at six time points before the IPF diagnosis (onset of symptoms, first contact to a general practitioner, first hospital contact, referral to an interstitial lung disease (ILD) centre, first visit at an ILD centre, and final diagnosis) were recorded in a multicentre cohort of 204 incident IPF patients. Based on these dates, the delay was divided into specific patient-related and healthcare-related delays. Demographic and clinical data were used to determine risk factors for a prolonged delay, using multivariate negative binomial regression analysis. Results: The median diagnostic delay was 2.1 years (IQR: 0.9-5.0), mainly attributable to the patients, general practitioners and community hospitals. Male sex was a risk factor for patient delay (IRR: 3.84, 95% CI: 1.17-11.36, p = 0.006) and old age was a risk factor for healthcare delay (IRR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.06, p = 0.004). The total delay was prolonged in previous users of inhalation therapy (IRR: 1.99, 95% CI: 1.40-2.88, p < 0.0001) but not in patients with airway obstruction. Misdiagnosis of respiratory symptoms was reported by 41% of all patients. Conclusion: Despite increased awareness of IPF, the diagnostic delay is still 2.1 years. Male sex, older age and treatment attempts for alternative diagnoses are risk factors for a delayed diagnosis of IPF. Efforts to reduce the diagnostic delay should focus on these risk factors. Trial registration: This study was registered at http://clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02772549) on May 10, 2016.

AB - Background: Surveys and retrospective studies of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) have shown a significant diagnostic delay. However, the causes and risk factors for this delay are not known. Methods: Dates at six time points before the IPF diagnosis (onset of symptoms, first contact to a general practitioner, first hospital contact, referral to an interstitial lung disease (ILD) centre, first visit at an ILD centre, and final diagnosis) were recorded in a multicentre cohort of 204 incident IPF patients. Based on these dates, the delay was divided into specific patient-related and healthcare-related delays. Demographic and clinical data were used to determine risk factors for a prolonged delay, using multivariate negative binomial regression analysis. Results: The median diagnostic delay was 2.1 years (IQR: 0.9-5.0), mainly attributable to the patients, general practitioners and community hospitals. Male sex was a risk factor for patient delay (IRR: 3.84, 95% CI: 1.17-11.36, p = 0.006) and old age was a risk factor for healthcare delay (IRR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.06, p = 0.004). The total delay was prolonged in previous users of inhalation therapy (IRR: 1.99, 95% CI: 1.40-2.88, p < 0.0001) but not in patients with airway obstruction. Misdiagnosis of respiratory symptoms was reported by 41% of all patients. Conclusion: Despite increased awareness of IPF, the diagnostic delay is still 2.1 years. Male sex, older age and treatment attempts for alternative diagnoses are risk factors for a delayed diagnosis of IPF. Efforts to reduce the diagnostic delay should focus on these risk factors. Trial registration: This study was registered at http://clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02772549) on May 10, 2016.

KW - Cohort

KW - Delay

KW - Diagnosis

KW - IPF

KW - Observational

U2 - 10.1186/s12931-019-1076-0

DO - 10.1186/s12931-019-1076-0

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 31126287

AN - SCOPUS:85066424337

VL - 20

JO - Respiratory Research (Print)

JF - Respiratory Research (Print)

SN - 1465-9921

M1 - 103

ER -

ID: 241355870