Health vs. wealth: Employer, employee and policy-maker perspectives on occupational heat stress across multiple European industries

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Health vs. wealth: Employer, employee and policy-maker perspectives on occupational heat stress across multiple European industries. / Morris, Nathan Bradley; Levi, Miriam; Morabito, Marco; Messeri, Alessandro; Ioannou, Leonidas G.; Flouris, Andreas D; Samoutis, George; Pogačar, Tjaša; Bogataj, Lučka Kajfež; Piil, Jacob Feder; Nybo, Lars.

I: Temperature, Bind 8, Nr. 3, 2021, s. 284-301.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Morris, NB, Levi, M, Morabito, M, Messeri, A, Ioannou, LG, Flouris, AD, Samoutis, G, Pogačar, T, Bogataj, LK, Piil, JF & Nybo, L 2021, 'Health vs. wealth: Employer, employee and policy-maker perspectives on occupational heat stress across multiple European industries', Temperature, bind 8, nr. 3, s. 284-301. https://doi.org/10.1080/23328940.2020.1852049

APA

Morris, N. B., Levi, M., Morabito, M., Messeri, A., Ioannou, L. G., Flouris, A. D., Samoutis, G., Pogačar, T., Bogataj, L. K., Piil, J. F., & Nybo, L. (2021). Health vs. wealth: Employer, employee and policy-maker perspectives on occupational heat stress across multiple European industries. Temperature, 8(3), 284-301. https://doi.org/10.1080/23328940.2020.1852049

Vancouver

Morris NB, Levi M, Morabito M, Messeri A, Ioannou LG, Flouris AD o.a. Health vs. wealth: Employer, employee and policy-maker perspectives on occupational heat stress across multiple European industries. Temperature. 2021;8(3):284-301. https://doi.org/10.1080/23328940.2020.1852049

Author

Morris, Nathan Bradley ; Levi, Miriam ; Morabito, Marco ; Messeri, Alessandro ; Ioannou, Leonidas G. ; Flouris, Andreas D ; Samoutis, George ; Pogačar, Tjaša ; Bogataj, Lučka Kajfež ; Piil, Jacob Feder ; Nybo, Lars. / Health vs. wealth: Employer, employee and policy-maker perspectives on occupational heat stress across multiple European industries. I: Temperature. 2021 ; Bind 8, Nr. 3. s. 284-301.

Bibtex

@article{3a2eae47e3bc414a9016569bf6701ef1,
title = "Health vs. wealth: Employer, employee and policy-maker perspectives on occupational heat stress across multiple European industries",
abstract = "Successful implementation of cooling strategies obviously depends on identifying effective interventions, but in industrial settings, it is equally important to consider feasibility and economic viability. Many cooling interventions are available, but the decision processes affecting adoption by end-users are not well elucidated. We therefore arranged two series of meetings with stakeholders to identify knowledge gaps, receive feedback on proposed cooling interventions, and discuss factors affecting implementation of heat-health interventions. This included four meetings attended by employers, employees, and health and safety officers (n = 41), and three meetings attended primarily by policy makers (n = 74), with feedback obtained via qualitative and quantitative questionnaires and focus group discussions. On a 10-point scale, both employers and employees valued worker safety (9.1 ± 1.8; mean±SD) and health (8.5 ± 1.9) as more important than protecting company profits (6.3 ± 2.3). Of the respondents, 41% were unaware of any cooling strategies at their company and of those who were aware, only 30% thought the interventions were effective. Following presentation of proposed interventions, the respondents rated “facilitated hydration”, “optimization of clothing/protective equipment”, and “rescheduling of work tasks” as the top-three preferred solutions. The main barriers for adopting cooling interventions were cost, feasibility, employer perceptions, and legislation. In conclusion, preventing negative health and safety effects was deemed to be more important than preventing productivity loss. Regardless of work sector or occupation, both health and wealth were emphasized as important parameters and considered as somewhat interrelated. However, a large fraction of the European worker force lacks information on effective measures to mitigate occupational heat stress. List of abbreviations: OH-Stress: Occupational heat stress; WBGT: Wet Bulb Globe Temperature.",
keywords = "Climate change, Cooling interventions, Heat action plans, Human adaptation, Occupational hygiene, Occupational medicine",
author = "Morris, {Nathan Bradley} and Miriam Levi and Marco Morabito and Alessandro Messeri and Ioannou, {Leonidas G.} and Flouris, {Andreas D} and George Samoutis and Tja{\v s}a Poga{\v c}ar and Bogataj, {Lu{\v c}ka Kajfe{\v z}} and Piil, {Jacob Feder} and Lars Nybo",
note = "CURIS 2021 NEXS 279)",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1080/23328940.2020.1852049",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "284--301",
journal = "Temperature",
issn = "2332-8940",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Health vs. wealth: Employer, employee and policy-maker perspectives on occupational heat stress across multiple European industries

AU - Morris, Nathan Bradley

AU - Levi, Miriam

AU - Morabito, Marco

AU - Messeri, Alessandro

AU - Ioannou, Leonidas G.

AU - Flouris, Andreas D

AU - Samoutis, George

AU - Pogačar, Tjaša

AU - Bogataj, Lučka Kajfež

AU - Piil, Jacob Feder

AU - Nybo, Lars

N1 - CURIS 2021 NEXS 279)

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Successful implementation of cooling strategies obviously depends on identifying effective interventions, but in industrial settings, it is equally important to consider feasibility and economic viability. Many cooling interventions are available, but the decision processes affecting adoption by end-users are not well elucidated. We therefore arranged two series of meetings with stakeholders to identify knowledge gaps, receive feedback on proposed cooling interventions, and discuss factors affecting implementation of heat-health interventions. This included four meetings attended by employers, employees, and health and safety officers (n = 41), and three meetings attended primarily by policy makers (n = 74), with feedback obtained via qualitative and quantitative questionnaires and focus group discussions. On a 10-point scale, both employers and employees valued worker safety (9.1 ± 1.8; mean±SD) and health (8.5 ± 1.9) as more important than protecting company profits (6.3 ± 2.3). Of the respondents, 41% were unaware of any cooling strategies at their company and of those who were aware, only 30% thought the interventions were effective. Following presentation of proposed interventions, the respondents rated “facilitated hydration”, “optimization of clothing/protective equipment”, and “rescheduling of work tasks” as the top-three preferred solutions. The main barriers for adopting cooling interventions were cost, feasibility, employer perceptions, and legislation. In conclusion, preventing negative health and safety effects was deemed to be more important than preventing productivity loss. Regardless of work sector or occupation, both health and wealth were emphasized as important parameters and considered as somewhat interrelated. However, a large fraction of the European worker force lacks information on effective measures to mitigate occupational heat stress. List of abbreviations: OH-Stress: Occupational heat stress; WBGT: Wet Bulb Globe Temperature.

AB - Successful implementation of cooling strategies obviously depends on identifying effective interventions, but in industrial settings, it is equally important to consider feasibility and economic viability. Many cooling interventions are available, but the decision processes affecting adoption by end-users are not well elucidated. We therefore arranged two series of meetings with stakeholders to identify knowledge gaps, receive feedback on proposed cooling interventions, and discuss factors affecting implementation of heat-health interventions. This included four meetings attended by employers, employees, and health and safety officers (n = 41), and three meetings attended primarily by policy makers (n = 74), with feedback obtained via qualitative and quantitative questionnaires and focus group discussions. On a 10-point scale, both employers and employees valued worker safety (9.1 ± 1.8; mean±SD) and health (8.5 ± 1.9) as more important than protecting company profits (6.3 ± 2.3). Of the respondents, 41% were unaware of any cooling strategies at their company and of those who were aware, only 30% thought the interventions were effective. Following presentation of proposed interventions, the respondents rated “facilitated hydration”, “optimization of clothing/protective equipment”, and “rescheduling of work tasks” as the top-three preferred solutions. The main barriers for adopting cooling interventions were cost, feasibility, employer perceptions, and legislation. In conclusion, preventing negative health and safety effects was deemed to be more important than preventing productivity loss. Regardless of work sector or occupation, both health and wealth were emphasized as important parameters and considered as somewhat interrelated. However, a large fraction of the European worker force lacks information on effective measures to mitigate occupational heat stress. List of abbreviations: OH-Stress: Occupational heat stress; WBGT: Wet Bulb Globe Temperature.

KW - Climate change

KW - Cooling interventions

KW - Heat action plans

KW - Human adaptation

KW - Occupational hygiene

KW - Occupational medicine

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85097560012&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/23328940.2020.1852049

DO - 10.1080/23328940.2020.1852049

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 34485621

AN - SCOPUS:85097560012

VL - 8

SP - 284

EP - 301

JO - Temperature

JF - Temperature

SN - 2332-8940

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 254521887