Nutritional characterisation of foods: Science-based approach to nutrient profiling. Summary report of an ILSI Europe workshop held in April 2006

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Nutritional characterisation of foods : Science-based approach to nutrient profiling. Summary report of an ILSI Europe workshop held in April 2006. / Tetens, Inge; Oberdörfer, Regina; Madsen, Carina; de Vries, Jan.

In: European Journal of Nutrition, Vol. 46, No. Suppl. 2, 2007, p. 4-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Tetens, I, Oberdörfer, R, Madsen, C & de Vries, J 2007, 'Nutritional characterisation of foods: Science-based approach to nutrient profiling. Summary report of an ILSI Europe workshop held in April 2006', European Journal of Nutrition, vol. 46, no. Suppl. 2, pp. 4-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-007-2003-6

APA

Tetens, I., Oberdörfer, R., Madsen, C., & de Vries, J. (2007). Nutritional characterisation of foods: Science-based approach to nutrient profiling. Summary report of an ILSI Europe workshop held in April 2006. European Journal of Nutrition, 46(Suppl. 2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-007-2003-6

Vancouver

Tetens I, Oberdörfer R, Madsen C, de Vries J. Nutritional characterisation of foods: Science-based approach to nutrient profiling. Summary report of an ILSI Europe workshop held in April 2006. European Journal of Nutrition. 2007;46(Suppl. 2):4-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-007-2003-6

Author

Tetens, Inge ; Oberdörfer, Regina ; Madsen, Carina ; de Vries, Jan. / Nutritional characterisation of foods : Science-based approach to nutrient profiling. Summary report of an ILSI Europe workshop held in April 2006. In: European Journal of Nutrition. 2007 ; Vol. 46, No. Suppl. 2. pp. 4-14.

Bibtex

@article{3097170a129a40f3993036ea08a6a9a3,
title = "Nutritional characterisation of foods: Science-based approach to nutrient profiling. Summary report of an ILSI Europe workshop held in April 2006",
abstract = "The background of the workshop was the proposed EU legislation to regulate nutrition and health claims for foods in Europe. This regulation will require the development of a science-based nutrient profiling system in order to determine which foods or categories of foods will be permitted to make nutrition or health claims. Nutrient profiling can also be used to categorize foods, based on an assessment of their nutrient composition according to scientific principles. Today, various nutrient profiling schemes are available to classify foods based on their nutritional characteristics. The aim of the workshop was to discuss the work developed by ILSI Europe's expert group and to explore wider scientific aspects of nutrient profiling, including their relative effectiveness, strengths and weaknesses. In particular, the focus of the workshop was on scientific approaches to the development of nutrient profiles for the purpose of regulating nutrition and health claims. The 76 workshop participants were scientists from European academic institutions, research institutes, food standards agencies, food industry and other interested parties, all of whom contributed their thinking on this topic. The workshop reached a degree of agreement on several central points. Most participants favored a food category approach rather than an 'across the board' system for nutrient profiling. Most also felt that nutrient profiling schemes should focus on disqualifying nutrients, while taking into due account relevant qualifying nutrients. Levels of each nutrient should be clearly defined for all food categories to be profiled. Reference amounts selected for further considerations were: (1) per 100 g/100 ml, (2) legislated reference amounts, and (3) per 100 kcal. The majority of workshop participants agreed that nutrient profiling schemes should allow for a two-step decision process; step (1) identify which nutrients to take into account, and step (2) define the thresholds for these nutrients. All participants agreed that an objective validation should be conducted before implementation of nutrient profiling. This would include determination of sensitivity and specificity using {"}indicator foods{"} selected on their potential to affect major health issues. The management of any adopted system needs to allow it to be dynamic over time and revise the system when new scientific knowledge emerges. The majority of participants favored a food category approach rather than an 'across the board' system. Further work is required to identify the final list of qualifying and disqualifying nutrients for any food category that may be identified and for the selection of optimal reference amounts. It is essential that key stakeholders continue to communicate and work together on the complex issues of nutrient profiling.",
keywords = "Benchmarking, European Union, Food, Food Analysis, Food Labeling, Food, Organic, Health Promotion, Humans, Legislation, Food, Nutrition Policy, Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Nutritive Value, Reference Values, Terminology as Topic, Congresses",
author = "Inge Tetens and Regina Oberd{\"o}rfer and Carina Madsen and {de Vries}, Jan",
year = "2007",
doi = "10.1007/s00394-007-2003-6",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "4--14",
journal = "European Journal of Nutrition",
issn = "1436-6207",
publisher = "Springer Medizin",
number = "Suppl. 2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nutritional characterisation of foods

T2 - Science-based approach to nutrient profiling. Summary report of an ILSI Europe workshop held in April 2006

AU - Tetens, Inge

AU - Oberdörfer, Regina

AU - Madsen, Carina

AU - de Vries, Jan

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - The background of the workshop was the proposed EU legislation to regulate nutrition and health claims for foods in Europe. This regulation will require the development of a science-based nutrient profiling system in order to determine which foods or categories of foods will be permitted to make nutrition or health claims. Nutrient profiling can also be used to categorize foods, based on an assessment of their nutrient composition according to scientific principles. Today, various nutrient profiling schemes are available to classify foods based on their nutritional characteristics. The aim of the workshop was to discuss the work developed by ILSI Europe's expert group and to explore wider scientific aspects of nutrient profiling, including their relative effectiveness, strengths and weaknesses. In particular, the focus of the workshop was on scientific approaches to the development of nutrient profiles for the purpose of regulating nutrition and health claims. The 76 workshop participants were scientists from European academic institutions, research institutes, food standards agencies, food industry and other interested parties, all of whom contributed their thinking on this topic. The workshop reached a degree of agreement on several central points. Most participants favored a food category approach rather than an 'across the board' system for nutrient profiling. Most also felt that nutrient profiling schemes should focus on disqualifying nutrients, while taking into due account relevant qualifying nutrients. Levels of each nutrient should be clearly defined for all food categories to be profiled. Reference amounts selected for further considerations were: (1) per 100 g/100 ml, (2) legislated reference amounts, and (3) per 100 kcal. The majority of workshop participants agreed that nutrient profiling schemes should allow for a two-step decision process; step (1) identify which nutrients to take into account, and step (2) define the thresholds for these nutrients. All participants agreed that an objective validation should be conducted before implementation of nutrient profiling. This would include determination of sensitivity and specificity using "indicator foods" selected on their potential to affect major health issues. The management of any adopted system needs to allow it to be dynamic over time and revise the system when new scientific knowledge emerges. The majority of participants favored a food category approach rather than an 'across the board' system. Further work is required to identify the final list of qualifying and disqualifying nutrients for any food category that may be identified and for the selection of optimal reference amounts. It is essential that key stakeholders continue to communicate and work together on the complex issues of nutrient profiling.

AB - The background of the workshop was the proposed EU legislation to regulate nutrition and health claims for foods in Europe. This regulation will require the development of a science-based nutrient profiling system in order to determine which foods or categories of foods will be permitted to make nutrition or health claims. Nutrient profiling can also be used to categorize foods, based on an assessment of their nutrient composition according to scientific principles. Today, various nutrient profiling schemes are available to classify foods based on their nutritional characteristics. The aim of the workshop was to discuss the work developed by ILSI Europe's expert group and to explore wider scientific aspects of nutrient profiling, including their relative effectiveness, strengths and weaknesses. In particular, the focus of the workshop was on scientific approaches to the development of nutrient profiles for the purpose of regulating nutrition and health claims. The 76 workshop participants were scientists from European academic institutions, research institutes, food standards agencies, food industry and other interested parties, all of whom contributed their thinking on this topic. The workshop reached a degree of agreement on several central points. Most participants favored a food category approach rather than an 'across the board' system for nutrient profiling. Most also felt that nutrient profiling schemes should focus on disqualifying nutrients, while taking into due account relevant qualifying nutrients. Levels of each nutrient should be clearly defined for all food categories to be profiled. Reference amounts selected for further considerations were: (1) per 100 g/100 ml, (2) legislated reference amounts, and (3) per 100 kcal. The majority of workshop participants agreed that nutrient profiling schemes should allow for a two-step decision process; step (1) identify which nutrients to take into account, and step (2) define the thresholds for these nutrients. All participants agreed that an objective validation should be conducted before implementation of nutrient profiling. This would include determination of sensitivity and specificity using "indicator foods" selected on their potential to affect major health issues. The management of any adopted system needs to allow it to be dynamic over time and revise the system when new scientific knowledge emerges. The majority of participants favored a food category approach rather than an 'across the board' system. Further work is required to identify the final list of qualifying and disqualifying nutrients for any food category that may be identified and for the selection of optimal reference amounts. It is essential that key stakeholders continue to communicate and work together on the complex issues of nutrient profiling.

KW - Benchmarking

KW - European Union

KW - Food

KW - Food Analysis

KW - Food Labeling

KW - Food, Organic

KW - Health Promotion

KW - Humans

KW - Legislation, Food

KW - Nutrition Policy

KW - Nutritional Physiological Phenomena

KW - Nutritive Value

KW - Reference Values

KW - Terminology as Topic

KW - Congresses

U2 - 10.1007/s00394-007-2003-6

DO - 10.1007/s00394-007-2003-6

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 18084732

VL - 46

SP - 4

EP - 14

JO - European Journal of Nutrition

JF - European Journal of Nutrition

SN - 1436-6207

IS - Suppl. 2

ER -

ID: 184389259