Mapping different intra-hemispheric parietal-motor networks using twin coil TMS

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Mapping different intra-hemispheric parietal-motor networks using twin coil TMS. / Karabanov, Anke Ninija; Chao, Chi Chao; Paine, Rainer; Hallett, Mark.

I: Brain Stimulation, Bind 6, Nr. 3, 2013, s. 384-389.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Karabanov, AN, Chao, CC, Paine, R & Hallett, M 2013, 'Mapping different intra-hemispheric parietal-motor networks using twin coil TMS', Brain Stimulation, bind 6, nr. 3, s. 384-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2012.08.002

APA

Karabanov, A. N., Chao, C. C., Paine, R., & Hallett, M. (2013). Mapping different intra-hemispheric parietal-motor networks using twin coil TMS. Brain Stimulation, 6(3), 384-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2012.08.002

Vancouver

Karabanov AN, Chao CC, Paine R, Hallett M. Mapping different intra-hemispheric parietal-motor networks using twin coil TMS. Brain Stimulation. 2013;6(3):384-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2012.08.002

Author

Karabanov, Anke Ninija ; Chao, Chi Chao ; Paine, Rainer ; Hallett, Mark. / Mapping different intra-hemispheric parietal-motor networks using twin coil TMS. I: Brain Stimulation. 2013 ; Bind 6, Nr. 3. s. 384-389.

Bibtex

@article{3d506bf6c1424969b8f84d211ff32c9b,
title = "Mapping different intra-hemispheric parietal-motor networks using twin coil TMS",
abstract = "Background: Accumulating evidence suggests anatomical and functional differences in connectivity between the anterior and posterior parts of the inferior-parietal lobule (IPL) and the frontal motor areas. Objective/ Hypothesis: This study investigates whether different intra-hemispheric parietal-motor interactions can be observed along the anterior-posterior axis of the IPL in the resting human brain. Methods: We use a twin coil transcranial magnetic stimulation technique to test intra-hemispheric interactions between three points adjacent to the intra-parietal sulcus (anterior, central, posterior) and the ipsilateral primary motor cortex (M1) at rest in both hemispheres. Results: We found that stimulation of the anterior IPL resulted in an inhibition of the ipsilateral M1 in both hemispheres. Stimulation of the central and posterior IPL resulted in a facilitatory effect on ipsilateral M1 in the left but not for the right hemisphere. Additionally we show that there is considerable inter-subject variability concerning the optimal parietal facilitatory and inhibitory position. Conclusions: The IPL has distinct inhibitory and facilitatory connections to the ipsilateral M1. Whereas inhibitory connections are observed in both hemispheres, facilitatory connections are asymmetric. These parietal-motor networks may represent the basis for the functional differences between these regions in reaching and grasping tasks and mirror the functional asymmetry observed in the motor system. From a practical point of view, we note that the inter-subject variability means that future TMS studies of the parietal area might consider a hot-spot localization similar to the procedures commonly used for M1.",
keywords = "Intra-hemispheric connectivity, Intra-parietal sulcus, Primary motor cortex, Twin-coil TMS",
author = "Karabanov, {Anke Ninija} and Chao, {Chi Chao} and Rainer Paine and Mark Hallett",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1016/j.brs.2012.08.002",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "384--389",
journal = "Brain Stimulation",
issn = "1935-861X",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mapping different intra-hemispheric parietal-motor networks using twin coil TMS

AU - Karabanov, Anke Ninija

AU - Chao, Chi Chao

AU - Paine, Rainer

AU - Hallett, Mark

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Background: Accumulating evidence suggests anatomical and functional differences in connectivity between the anterior and posterior parts of the inferior-parietal lobule (IPL) and the frontal motor areas. Objective/ Hypothesis: This study investigates whether different intra-hemispheric parietal-motor interactions can be observed along the anterior-posterior axis of the IPL in the resting human brain. Methods: We use a twin coil transcranial magnetic stimulation technique to test intra-hemispheric interactions between three points adjacent to the intra-parietal sulcus (anterior, central, posterior) and the ipsilateral primary motor cortex (M1) at rest in both hemispheres. Results: We found that stimulation of the anterior IPL resulted in an inhibition of the ipsilateral M1 in both hemispheres. Stimulation of the central and posterior IPL resulted in a facilitatory effect on ipsilateral M1 in the left but not for the right hemisphere. Additionally we show that there is considerable inter-subject variability concerning the optimal parietal facilitatory and inhibitory position. Conclusions: The IPL has distinct inhibitory and facilitatory connections to the ipsilateral M1. Whereas inhibitory connections are observed in both hemispheres, facilitatory connections are asymmetric. These parietal-motor networks may represent the basis for the functional differences between these regions in reaching and grasping tasks and mirror the functional asymmetry observed in the motor system. From a practical point of view, we note that the inter-subject variability means that future TMS studies of the parietal area might consider a hot-spot localization similar to the procedures commonly used for M1.

AB - Background: Accumulating evidence suggests anatomical and functional differences in connectivity between the anterior and posterior parts of the inferior-parietal lobule (IPL) and the frontal motor areas. Objective/ Hypothesis: This study investigates whether different intra-hemispheric parietal-motor interactions can be observed along the anterior-posterior axis of the IPL in the resting human brain. Methods: We use a twin coil transcranial magnetic stimulation technique to test intra-hemispheric interactions between three points adjacent to the intra-parietal sulcus (anterior, central, posterior) and the ipsilateral primary motor cortex (M1) at rest in both hemispheres. Results: We found that stimulation of the anterior IPL resulted in an inhibition of the ipsilateral M1 in both hemispheres. Stimulation of the central and posterior IPL resulted in a facilitatory effect on ipsilateral M1 in the left but not for the right hemisphere. Additionally we show that there is considerable inter-subject variability concerning the optimal parietal facilitatory and inhibitory position. Conclusions: The IPL has distinct inhibitory and facilitatory connections to the ipsilateral M1. Whereas inhibitory connections are observed in both hemispheres, facilitatory connections are asymmetric. These parietal-motor networks may represent the basis for the functional differences between these regions in reaching and grasping tasks and mirror the functional asymmetry observed in the motor system. From a practical point of view, we note that the inter-subject variability means that future TMS studies of the parietal area might consider a hot-spot localization similar to the procedures commonly used for M1.

KW - Intra-hemispheric connectivity

KW - Intra-parietal sulcus

KW - Primary motor cortex

KW - Twin-coil TMS

U2 - 10.1016/j.brs.2012.08.002

DO - 10.1016/j.brs.2012.08.002

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 22939165

AN - SCOPUS:84877754930

VL - 6

SP - 384

EP - 389

JO - Brain Stimulation

JF - Brain Stimulation

SN - 1935-861X

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 218467799