Indicators to assess physiological heat strain – Part 1: Systematic review

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

Standard

Indicators to assess physiological heat strain – Part 1: Systematic review. / Ioannou, Leonidas G; Mantzios, Konstantinos; Tsoutsoubi, Lydia; Notley, Sean R; Dinas, Petros C; Brearley, Matt; Epstein, Yoram; Havenith, George; Sawka, Michael N; Bröde, Peter; Mekjavic, Igor B; Kenny, Glen P; Bernard, Thomas E; Nybo, Lars; Flouris, Andreas D.

In: Temperature, Vol. 9, No. 3, 2022, p. 227-262.

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Ioannou, LG, Mantzios, K, Tsoutsoubi, L, Notley, SR, Dinas, PC, Brearley, M, Epstein, Y, Havenith, G, Sawka, MN, Bröde, P, Mekjavic, IB, Kenny, GP, Bernard, TE, Nybo, L & Flouris, AD 2022, 'Indicators to assess physiological heat strain – Part 1: Systematic review', Temperature, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 227-262. https://doi.org/10.1080/23328940.2022.2037376

APA

Ioannou, L. G., Mantzios, K., Tsoutsoubi, L., Notley, S. R., Dinas, P. C., Brearley, M., Epstein, Y., Havenith, G., Sawka, M. N., Bröde, P., Mekjavic, I. B., Kenny, G. P., Bernard, T. E., Nybo, L., & Flouris, A. D. (2022). Indicators to assess physiological heat strain – Part 1: Systematic review. Temperature, 9(3), 227-262. https://doi.org/10.1080/23328940.2022.2037376

Vancouver

Ioannou LG, Mantzios K, Tsoutsoubi L, Notley SR, Dinas PC, Brearley M et al. Indicators to assess physiological heat strain – Part 1: Systematic review. Temperature. 2022;9(3):227-262. https://doi.org/10.1080/23328940.2022.2037376

Author

Ioannou, Leonidas G ; Mantzios, Konstantinos ; Tsoutsoubi, Lydia ; Notley, Sean R ; Dinas, Petros C ; Brearley, Matt ; Epstein, Yoram ; Havenith, George ; Sawka, Michael N ; Bröde, Peter ; Mekjavic, Igor B ; Kenny, Glen P ; Bernard, Thomas E ; Nybo, Lars ; Flouris, Andreas D. / Indicators to assess physiological heat strain – Part 1: Systematic review. In: Temperature. 2022 ; Vol. 9, No. 3. pp. 227-262.

Bibtex

@article{ef8650302df249b68db914bed3b2d7e4,
title = "Indicators to assess physiological heat strain – Part 1: Systematic review",
abstract = "In a series of three companion papers published in this Journal, we identify and validate the available thermal stress indicators (TSIs). In this first paper of the series, we conducted a systematic review (registration: INPLASY202090088) to identify all TSIs and provide reliable information regarding their use (funded by EU Horizon 2020; HEAT-SHIELD). Eight databases (PubMed, Agricultural and Environmental Science Collection, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, Russian Science Citation Index, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar) were searched from database inception to 15 April 2020. No restrictions on language or study design were applied. Of the 879 publications identified, 232 records were considered for further analysis. This search identified 340 instruments and indicators developed between 200 BC and 2019 AD. Of these, 153 are nomograms, instruments, and/or require detailed non-meteorological information, while 187 can be mathematically calculated utilizing only meteorological data. Of these meteorology-based TSIs, 127 were developed for people who are physically active, and 61 of those are eligible for use in occupational settings. Information regarding the equation, operating range, interpretation categories, required input data, as well as a free software to calculate all 187 meteorology-based TSIs is provided. The information presented in this systematic review should be adopted by those interested in performing on-site monitoring and/or big data analytics for climate services to ensure appropriate use of the meteorology-based TSIs. Studies two and three in this series of companion papers present guidance on the application and validation of these TSIs, to guide end users of these indicators for more effective use.",
keywords = "Exercise, Heat indices, Heat strain, Hyperthermia, Labour, Occupational, Temperature, Thermal indices, Work",
author = "Ioannou, {Leonidas G} and Konstantinos Mantzios and Lydia Tsoutsoubi and Notley, {Sean R} and Dinas, {Petros C} and Matt Brearley and Yoram Epstein and George Havenith and Sawka, {Michael N} and Peter Br{\"o}de and Mekjavic, {Igor B} and Kenny, {Glen P} and Bernard, {Thomas E} and Lars Nybo and Flouris, {Andreas D}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1080/23328940.2022.2037376",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "227--262",
journal = "Temperature",
issn = "2332-8940",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Indicators to assess physiological heat strain – Part 1: Systematic review

AU - Ioannou, Leonidas G

AU - Mantzios, Konstantinos

AU - Tsoutsoubi, Lydia

AU - Notley, Sean R

AU - Dinas, Petros C

AU - Brearley, Matt

AU - Epstein, Yoram

AU - Havenith, George

AU - Sawka, Michael N

AU - Bröde, Peter

AU - Mekjavic, Igor B

AU - Kenny, Glen P

AU - Bernard, Thomas E

AU - Nybo, Lars

AU - Flouris, Andreas D

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - In a series of three companion papers published in this Journal, we identify and validate the available thermal stress indicators (TSIs). In this first paper of the series, we conducted a systematic review (registration: INPLASY202090088) to identify all TSIs and provide reliable information regarding their use (funded by EU Horizon 2020; HEAT-SHIELD). Eight databases (PubMed, Agricultural and Environmental Science Collection, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, Russian Science Citation Index, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar) were searched from database inception to 15 April 2020. No restrictions on language or study design were applied. Of the 879 publications identified, 232 records were considered for further analysis. This search identified 340 instruments and indicators developed between 200 BC and 2019 AD. Of these, 153 are nomograms, instruments, and/or require detailed non-meteorological information, while 187 can be mathematically calculated utilizing only meteorological data. Of these meteorology-based TSIs, 127 were developed for people who are physically active, and 61 of those are eligible for use in occupational settings. Information regarding the equation, operating range, interpretation categories, required input data, as well as a free software to calculate all 187 meteorology-based TSIs is provided. The information presented in this systematic review should be adopted by those interested in performing on-site monitoring and/or big data analytics for climate services to ensure appropriate use of the meteorology-based TSIs. Studies two and three in this series of companion papers present guidance on the application and validation of these TSIs, to guide end users of these indicators for more effective use.

AB - In a series of three companion papers published in this Journal, we identify and validate the available thermal stress indicators (TSIs). In this first paper of the series, we conducted a systematic review (registration: INPLASY202090088) to identify all TSIs and provide reliable information regarding their use (funded by EU Horizon 2020; HEAT-SHIELD). Eight databases (PubMed, Agricultural and Environmental Science Collection, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, Russian Science Citation Index, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar) were searched from database inception to 15 April 2020. No restrictions on language or study design were applied. Of the 879 publications identified, 232 records were considered for further analysis. This search identified 340 instruments and indicators developed between 200 BC and 2019 AD. Of these, 153 are nomograms, instruments, and/or require detailed non-meteorological information, while 187 can be mathematically calculated utilizing only meteorological data. Of these meteorology-based TSIs, 127 were developed for people who are physically active, and 61 of those are eligible for use in occupational settings. Information regarding the equation, operating range, interpretation categories, required input data, as well as a free software to calculate all 187 meteorology-based TSIs is provided. The information presented in this systematic review should be adopted by those interested in performing on-site monitoring and/or big data analytics for climate services to ensure appropriate use of the meteorology-based TSIs. Studies two and three in this series of companion papers present guidance on the application and validation of these TSIs, to guide end users of these indicators for more effective use.

KW - Exercise

KW - Heat indices

KW - Heat strain

KW - Hyperthermia

KW - Labour

KW - Occupational

KW - Temperature

KW - Thermal indices

KW - Work

U2 - 10.1080/23328940.2022.2037376

DO - 10.1080/23328940.2022.2037376

M3 - Review

C2 - 36211945

AN - SCOPUS:85135267683

VL - 9

SP - 227

EP - 262

JO - Temperature

JF - Temperature

SN - 2332-8940

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 316059234