Surround inhibition in the primary motor cortex is task-specifically modulated in non-professional musicians but not in healthy controls during real piano playing

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Surround inhibition in the primary motor cortex is task-specifically modulated in non-professional musicians but not in healthy controls during real piano playing. / Márquez, Gonzalo; Keller, Martin; Lundbye-Jensen, Jesper; Taube, Wolfgang.

In: Neuroscience, Vol. 373, 2018, p. 106-112.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Márquez, G, Keller, M, Lundbye-Jensen, J & Taube, W 2018, 'Surround inhibition in the primary motor cortex is task-specifically modulated in non-professional musicians but not in healthy controls during real piano playing', Neuroscience, vol. 373, pp. 106-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.01.017

APA

Márquez, G., Keller, M., Lundbye-Jensen, J., & Taube, W. (2018). Surround inhibition in the primary motor cortex is task-specifically modulated in non-professional musicians but not in healthy controls during real piano playing. Neuroscience, 373, 106-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.01.017

Vancouver

Márquez G, Keller M, Lundbye-Jensen J, Taube W. Surround inhibition in the primary motor cortex is task-specifically modulated in non-professional musicians but not in healthy controls during real piano playing. Neuroscience. 2018;373:106-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.01.017

Author

Márquez, Gonzalo ; Keller, Martin ; Lundbye-Jensen, Jesper ; Taube, Wolfgang. / Surround inhibition in the primary motor cortex is task-specifically modulated in non-professional musicians but not in healthy controls during real piano playing. In: Neuroscience. 2018 ; Vol. 373. pp. 106-112.

Bibtex

@article{8beadfd33f8a44069f25ae6d0bbb23e3,
title = "Surround inhibition in the primary motor cortex is task-specifically modulated in non-professional musicians but not in healthy controls during real piano playing",
abstract = "Research has indicated that at the onset of a finger movement, unwanted contractions of adjacent muscles are prevented by inhibiting the cortical areas representing these muscles. This so-called surround inhibition (SI) seems relevant for the performance of selective finger movements but may not be necessary for tasks involving functional coupling between different finger muscles. Therefore, the present study compared SI between isolated finger movement and complex selective finger movements while playing a three-finger sequence on the piano in 9 non-professional musicians and 10 untrained control participants. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied to the contralateral motor cortex to assess SI in the first dorsal interosseous (FDI), abductor pollicis brevis (APB) and abductor digiti minimi (ADM) during the movement preparation and the late phasic phases. The results reveal stronger SI during the preparation phase than during the phasic phase (30.6% vs. 10.7%; p<0.05) in the isolated-finger condition in both musicians and controls. Results also show higher SI in musicians during the preparation phase of the isolated finger condition compared to the preparation phase of the three-finger sequence (40% vs. 15%; p<0.05). However, the control group did not show this task-specific modulation of SI (isolated: 25% vs. sequence: 25%; p>0.05). Thus, musicians were able to modulate SI between conditions whereas control participants revealed constant levels of SI. Therefore, it may be assumed that long-term training as observed in skilled musicians is accompanied by task-specific effects on SI modulation potentially relating to the ability to perform selective and complex finger movements.",
keywords = "Motor surround inhibition, Transcranial magnetic stimulation, Primary motor cortex, Task complexity, Musicians",
author = "Gonzalo M{\'a}rquez and Martin Keller and Jesper Lundbye-Jensen and Wolfgang Taube",
note = "CURIS 2018 NEXS 063",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.01.017",
language = "English",
volume = "373",
pages = "106--112",
journal = "Neuroscience",
issn = "0306-4522",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surround inhibition in the primary motor cortex is task-specifically modulated in non-professional musicians but not in healthy controls during real piano playing

AU - Márquez, Gonzalo

AU - Keller, Martin

AU - Lundbye-Jensen, Jesper

AU - Taube, Wolfgang

N1 - CURIS 2018 NEXS 063

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Research has indicated that at the onset of a finger movement, unwanted contractions of adjacent muscles are prevented by inhibiting the cortical areas representing these muscles. This so-called surround inhibition (SI) seems relevant for the performance of selective finger movements but may not be necessary for tasks involving functional coupling between different finger muscles. Therefore, the present study compared SI between isolated finger movement and complex selective finger movements while playing a three-finger sequence on the piano in 9 non-professional musicians and 10 untrained control participants. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied to the contralateral motor cortex to assess SI in the first dorsal interosseous (FDI), abductor pollicis brevis (APB) and abductor digiti minimi (ADM) during the movement preparation and the late phasic phases. The results reveal stronger SI during the preparation phase than during the phasic phase (30.6% vs. 10.7%; p<0.05) in the isolated-finger condition in both musicians and controls. Results also show higher SI in musicians during the preparation phase of the isolated finger condition compared to the preparation phase of the three-finger sequence (40% vs. 15%; p<0.05). However, the control group did not show this task-specific modulation of SI (isolated: 25% vs. sequence: 25%; p>0.05). Thus, musicians were able to modulate SI between conditions whereas control participants revealed constant levels of SI. Therefore, it may be assumed that long-term training as observed in skilled musicians is accompanied by task-specific effects on SI modulation potentially relating to the ability to perform selective and complex finger movements.

AB - Research has indicated that at the onset of a finger movement, unwanted contractions of adjacent muscles are prevented by inhibiting the cortical areas representing these muscles. This so-called surround inhibition (SI) seems relevant for the performance of selective finger movements but may not be necessary for tasks involving functional coupling between different finger muscles. Therefore, the present study compared SI between isolated finger movement and complex selective finger movements while playing a three-finger sequence on the piano in 9 non-professional musicians and 10 untrained control participants. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied to the contralateral motor cortex to assess SI in the first dorsal interosseous (FDI), abductor pollicis brevis (APB) and abductor digiti minimi (ADM) during the movement preparation and the late phasic phases. The results reveal stronger SI during the preparation phase than during the phasic phase (30.6% vs. 10.7%; p<0.05) in the isolated-finger condition in both musicians and controls. Results also show higher SI in musicians during the preparation phase of the isolated finger condition compared to the preparation phase of the three-finger sequence (40% vs. 15%; p<0.05). However, the control group did not show this task-specific modulation of SI (isolated: 25% vs. sequence: 25%; p>0.05). Thus, musicians were able to modulate SI between conditions whereas control participants revealed constant levels of SI. Therefore, it may be assumed that long-term training as observed in skilled musicians is accompanied by task-specific effects on SI modulation potentially relating to the ability to perform selective and complex finger movements.

KW - Motor surround inhibition

KW - Transcranial magnetic stimulation

KW - Primary motor cortex

KW - Task complexity

KW - Musicians

U2 - 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.01.017

DO - 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.01.017

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 29339326

VL - 373

SP - 106

EP - 112

JO - Neuroscience

JF - Neuroscience

SN - 0306-4522

ER -

ID: 188678124