Repeatability and reproducibility of lipoprotein particle profile measurements in plasma samples by ultracentrifugation

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Repeatability and reproducibility of lipoprotein particle profile measurements in plasma samples by ultracentrifugation. / Monsonis-Centelles, Sandra; Hoefsloot, Huub C.J.; Engelsen, Søren Balling; Smilde, Age Klaas; Lind, Mads Vendelbo.

I: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Bind 58, Nr. 1, 2020, s. 103-115.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Monsonis-Centelles, S, Hoefsloot, HCJ, Engelsen, SB, Smilde, AK & Lind, MV 2020, 'Repeatability and reproducibility of lipoprotein particle profile measurements in plasma samples by ultracentrifugation', Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, bind 58, nr. 1, s. 103-115. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2019-0729

APA

Monsonis-Centelles, S., Hoefsloot, H. C. J., Engelsen, S. B., Smilde, A. K., & Lind, M. V. (2020). Repeatability and reproducibility of lipoprotein particle profile measurements in plasma samples by ultracentrifugation. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 58(1), 103-115. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2019-0729

Vancouver

Monsonis-Centelles S, Hoefsloot HCJ, Engelsen SB, Smilde AK, Lind MV. Repeatability and reproducibility of lipoprotein particle profile measurements in plasma samples by ultracentrifugation. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. 2020;58(1):103-115. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2019-0729

Author

Monsonis-Centelles, Sandra ; Hoefsloot, Huub C.J. ; Engelsen, Søren Balling ; Smilde, Age Klaas ; Lind, Mads Vendelbo. / Repeatability and reproducibility of lipoprotein particle profile measurements in plasma samples by ultracentrifugation. I: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. 2020 ; Bind 58, Nr. 1. s. 103-115.

Bibtex

@article{2a0c81851eb243e58ba6b4902234ef7d,
title = "Repeatability and reproducibility of lipoprotein particle profile measurements in plasma samples by ultracentrifugation",
abstract = "Background: Characterization of lipoprotein particle profiles (LPPs) (including main classes and subclasses) by means of ultracentrifugation (UC) is highly requested given its clinical potential. However, rapid methods are required to replace the very labor-intensive UC method and one solution is to calibrate rapid nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)-based prediction models, but the reliability of the UC-response method required for the NMR calibration has been largely overlooked. Methods: This study provides a comprehensive repeatability and reproducibility study of various UC-based lipid measurements (cholesterol, triglycerides [TGs], free cholesterol, phospholipids, apolipoprotein [apo]A1 and apoB) in different main classes and subclasses of 25 duplicated fresh plasma samples and of 42 quality control (QC) frozen pooled plasma samples of healthy individuals. Results: Cholesterol, apoA1 and apoB measurements were very repeatable in all classes (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]: 92.93{\%}-99.54{\%}). Free cholesterol and phospholipid concentrations in main classes and subclasses and TG concentrations in high-density lipoproteins (HDL), HDL subclasses and low-density lipoproteins (LDL) subclasses, showed worse repeatability (ICC: 19.21{\%}-99.08{\%}) attributable to low concentrations, variability introduced during UC and assay limitations. On frozen QC samples, the reproducibility of cholesterol, apoA1 and apoB concentrations was found to be better than for the free cholesterol, phospholipids and TGs concentrations. Conclusions: This study shows that for LPPs measurements near or below the limit of detection (LOD) in some of the subclasses, as well as the use of frozen samples, results in worsened repeatability and reproducibility. Furthermore, we show that the analytical assay coupled to UC for free cholesterol and phospholipids have different repeatability and reproducibility. All of this needs to be taken into account when calibrating future NMR-based models.",
keywords = "Faculty of Science, Analytical variation, Cholesterol, Dyslipidemia, Lipoproteins, Quality control, Triglycerides, Variability",
author = "Sandra Monsonis-Centelles and Hoefsloot, {Huub C.J.} and Engelsen, {S{\o}ren Balling} and Smilde, {Age Klaas} and Lind, {Mads Vendelbo}",
note = "CURIS 2019 NEXS 311",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1515/cclm-2019-0729",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "103--115",
journal = "Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine",
issn = "1434-6621",
publisher = "Walterde Gruyter GmbH",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Repeatability and reproducibility of lipoprotein particle profile measurements in plasma samples by ultracentrifugation

AU - Monsonis-Centelles, Sandra

AU - Hoefsloot, Huub C.J.

AU - Engelsen, Søren Balling

AU - Smilde, Age Klaas

AU - Lind, Mads Vendelbo

N1 - CURIS 2019 NEXS 311

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Background: Characterization of lipoprotein particle profiles (LPPs) (including main classes and subclasses) by means of ultracentrifugation (UC) is highly requested given its clinical potential. However, rapid methods are required to replace the very labor-intensive UC method and one solution is to calibrate rapid nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)-based prediction models, but the reliability of the UC-response method required for the NMR calibration has been largely overlooked. Methods: This study provides a comprehensive repeatability and reproducibility study of various UC-based lipid measurements (cholesterol, triglycerides [TGs], free cholesterol, phospholipids, apolipoprotein [apo]A1 and apoB) in different main classes and subclasses of 25 duplicated fresh plasma samples and of 42 quality control (QC) frozen pooled plasma samples of healthy individuals. Results: Cholesterol, apoA1 and apoB measurements were very repeatable in all classes (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]: 92.93%-99.54%). Free cholesterol and phospholipid concentrations in main classes and subclasses and TG concentrations in high-density lipoproteins (HDL), HDL subclasses and low-density lipoproteins (LDL) subclasses, showed worse repeatability (ICC: 19.21%-99.08%) attributable to low concentrations, variability introduced during UC and assay limitations. On frozen QC samples, the reproducibility of cholesterol, apoA1 and apoB concentrations was found to be better than for the free cholesterol, phospholipids and TGs concentrations. Conclusions: This study shows that for LPPs measurements near or below the limit of detection (LOD) in some of the subclasses, as well as the use of frozen samples, results in worsened repeatability and reproducibility. Furthermore, we show that the analytical assay coupled to UC for free cholesterol and phospholipids have different repeatability and reproducibility. All of this needs to be taken into account when calibrating future NMR-based models.

AB - Background: Characterization of lipoprotein particle profiles (LPPs) (including main classes and subclasses) by means of ultracentrifugation (UC) is highly requested given its clinical potential. However, rapid methods are required to replace the very labor-intensive UC method and one solution is to calibrate rapid nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)-based prediction models, but the reliability of the UC-response method required for the NMR calibration has been largely overlooked. Methods: This study provides a comprehensive repeatability and reproducibility study of various UC-based lipid measurements (cholesterol, triglycerides [TGs], free cholesterol, phospholipids, apolipoprotein [apo]A1 and apoB) in different main classes and subclasses of 25 duplicated fresh plasma samples and of 42 quality control (QC) frozen pooled plasma samples of healthy individuals. Results: Cholesterol, apoA1 and apoB measurements were very repeatable in all classes (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]: 92.93%-99.54%). Free cholesterol and phospholipid concentrations in main classes and subclasses and TG concentrations in high-density lipoproteins (HDL), HDL subclasses and low-density lipoproteins (LDL) subclasses, showed worse repeatability (ICC: 19.21%-99.08%) attributable to low concentrations, variability introduced during UC and assay limitations. On frozen QC samples, the reproducibility of cholesterol, apoA1 and apoB concentrations was found to be better than for the free cholesterol, phospholipids and TGs concentrations. Conclusions: This study shows that for LPPs measurements near or below the limit of detection (LOD) in some of the subclasses, as well as the use of frozen samples, results in worsened repeatability and reproducibility. Furthermore, we show that the analytical assay coupled to UC for free cholesterol and phospholipids have different repeatability and reproducibility. All of this needs to be taken into account when calibrating future NMR-based models.

KW - Faculty of Science

KW - Analytical variation

KW - Cholesterol

KW - Dyslipidemia

KW - Lipoproteins

KW - Quality control

KW - Triglycerides

KW - Variability

U2 - 10.1515/cclm-2019-0729

DO - 10.1515/cclm-2019-0729

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 31553695

VL - 58

SP - 103

EP - 115

JO - Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine

JF - Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine

SN - 1434-6621

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 227985535