Time-wise change in neck pain in response to rehabilitation with specific resistance training: implications for exercise prescription

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Time-wise change in neck pain in response to rehabilitation with specific resistance training : implications for exercise prescription. / Zebis, Mette Kreutzfeldt; Andersen, Christoffer H; Sundstrup, Emil; Pedersen, Mogens Theisen; Sjøgaard, Gisela; Andersen, Lars L.

I: P L o S One, Bind 9, Nr. 4, e93867, 2014.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Zebis, MK, Andersen, CH, Sundstrup, E, Pedersen, MT, Sjøgaard, G & Andersen, LL 2014, 'Time-wise change in neck pain in response to rehabilitation with specific resistance training: implications for exercise prescription', P L o S One, bind 9, nr. 4, e93867. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093867

APA

Zebis, M. K., Andersen, C. H., Sundstrup, E., Pedersen, M. T., Sjøgaard, G., & Andersen, L. L. (2014). Time-wise change in neck pain in response to rehabilitation with specific resistance training: implications for exercise prescription. P L o S One, 9(4), [e93867]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093867

Vancouver

Zebis MK, Andersen CH, Sundstrup E, Pedersen MT, Sjøgaard G, Andersen LL. Time-wise change in neck pain in response to rehabilitation with specific resistance training: implications for exercise prescription. P L o S One. 2014;9(4). e93867. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093867

Author

Zebis, Mette Kreutzfeldt ; Andersen, Christoffer H ; Sundstrup, Emil ; Pedersen, Mogens Theisen ; Sjøgaard, Gisela ; Andersen, Lars L. / Time-wise change in neck pain in response to rehabilitation with specific resistance training : implications for exercise prescription. I: P L o S One. 2014 ; Bind 9, Nr. 4.

Bibtex

@article{55e83ca4a2934053a0a38ecffe346d4e,
title = "Time-wise change in neck pain in response to rehabilitation with specific resistance training: implications for exercise prescription",
abstract = "Purpose To determine the time-wise effect of specific resistance training on neck pain among industrial technicians with frequent neck pain symptoms. Methods Secondary analysis of a parallel-group cluster randomized controlled trial of 20 weeks performed at two large industrial production units in Copenhagen, Denmark. Women with neck pain >30 mm VAS (N = 131) were included in the present analysis. The training group (N = 77) performed specific resistance training for the neck/shoulder muscles three times a week, and the control group (N = 54) received advice to stay active. Participants of both groups registered neck pain intensity (0–100 mm VAS) once a week. Results Neck pain intensity was 55 mm (SD 23) at baseline. There was a significant group by time interaction for neck pain (F-value 2.61, P<0.001, DF = 19). Between-group differences in neck pain reached significance after 4 weeks (11 mm, 95% CI 2 to 20). The time-wise change in pain showed three phases; a rapid decrease in the training group compared with the control group during the initial 7 weeks, a slower decrease in pain during the following weeks (week 8–15), and a plateau during the last weeks (week 16–20). Adherence to training followed a two-phase pattern, i.e. weekly participation rate was between 70–86% during the initial 7 weeks, dropping towards 55–63% during the latter half of the training period. Conclusion Four weeks of specific resistance training reduced neck pain significantly, but 15 weeks is required to achieve maximal pain reduction. The time-wise change in pain followed a three-phase pattern with a rapid effect during the initial 7 weeks followed by a slower but still positive effect, and finally a plateau from week 15 and onwards. Decreased participation rate may explain the decreased efficacy during the latter phase of the intervention.",
author = "Zebis, {Mette Kreutzfeldt} and Andersen, {Christoffer H} and Emil Sundstrup and Pedersen, {Mogens Theisen} and Gisela Sj{\o}gaard and Andersen, {Lars L}",
note = "CURIS 2014 NEXS 138",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0093867",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "PLoS ONE",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Time-wise change in neck pain in response to rehabilitation with specific resistance training

T2 - implications for exercise prescription

AU - Zebis, Mette Kreutzfeldt

AU - Andersen, Christoffer H

AU - Sundstrup, Emil

AU - Pedersen, Mogens Theisen

AU - Sjøgaard, Gisela

AU - Andersen, Lars L

N1 - CURIS 2014 NEXS 138

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Purpose To determine the time-wise effect of specific resistance training on neck pain among industrial technicians with frequent neck pain symptoms. Methods Secondary analysis of a parallel-group cluster randomized controlled trial of 20 weeks performed at two large industrial production units in Copenhagen, Denmark. Women with neck pain >30 mm VAS (N = 131) were included in the present analysis. The training group (N = 77) performed specific resistance training for the neck/shoulder muscles three times a week, and the control group (N = 54) received advice to stay active. Participants of both groups registered neck pain intensity (0–100 mm VAS) once a week. Results Neck pain intensity was 55 mm (SD 23) at baseline. There was a significant group by time interaction for neck pain (F-value 2.61, P<0.001, DF = 19). Between-group differences in neck pain reached significance after 4 weeks (11 mm, 95% CI 2 to 20). The time-wise change in pain showed three phases; a rapid decrease in the training group compared with the control group during the initial 7 weeks, a slower decrease in pain during the following weeks (week 8–15), and a plateau during the last weeks (week 16–20). Adherence to training followed a two-phase pattern, i.e. weekly participation rate was between 70–86% during the initial 7 weeks, dropping towards 55–63% during the latter half of the training period. Conclusion Four weeks of specific resistance training reduced neck pain significantly, but 15 weeks is required to achieve maximal pain reduction. The time-wise change in pain followed a three-phase pattern with a rapid effect during the initial 7 weeks followed by a slower but still positive effect, and finally a plateau from week 15 and onwards. Decreased participation rate may explain the decreased efficacy during the latter phase of the intervention.

AB - Purpose To determine the time-wise effect of specific resistance training on neck pain among industrial technicians with frequent neck pain symptoms. Methods Secondary analysis of a parallel-group cluster randomized controlled trial of 20 weeks performed at two large industrial production units in Copenhagen, Denmark. Women with neck pain >30 mm VAS (N = 131) were included in the present analysis. The training group (N = 77) performed specific resistance training for the neck/shoulder muscles three times a week, and the control group (N = 54) received advice to stay active. Participants of both groups registered neck pain intensity (0–100 mm VAS) once a week. Results Neck pain intensity was 55 mm (SD 23) at baseline. There was a significant group by time interaction for neck pain (F-value 2.61, P<0.001, DF = 19). Between-group differences in neck pain reached significance after 4 weeks (11 mm, 95% CI 2 to 20). The time-wise change in pain showed three phases; a rapid decrease in the training group compared with the control group during the initial 7 weeks, a slower decrease in pain during the following weeks (week 8–15), and a plateau during the last weeks (week 16–20). Adherence to training followed a two-phase pattern, i.e. weekly participation rate was between 70–86% during the initial 7 weeks, dropping towards 55–63% during the latter half of the training period. Conclusion Four weeks of specific resistance training reduced neck pain significantly, but 15 weeks is required to achieve maximal pain reduction. The time-wise change in pain followed a three-phase pattern with a rapid effect during the initial 7 weeks followed by a slower but still positive effect, and finally a plateau from week 15 and onwards. Decreased participation rate may explain the decreased efficacy during the latter phase of the intervention.

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0093867

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0093867

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 24709874

VL - 9

JO - PLoS ONE

JF - PLoS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 4

M1 - e93867

ER -

ID: 110248032