The moral disengagement in doping scale

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelfagfællebedømt

Standard

The moral disengagement in doping scale. / Kavussanu, Maria; Hatzigeorgiadis, Antonis; Elbe, Anne-Marie; Ring, Christopher.

I: Psychology of Sport and Exercise, Bind 24, 2016, s. 188-198.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Kavussanu, M, Hatzigeorgiadis, A, Elbe, A-M & Ring, C 2016, 'The moral disengagement in doping scale', Psychology of Sport and Exercise, bind 24, s. 188-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2016.02.003

APA

Kavussanu, M., Hatzigeorgiadis, A., Elbe, A-M., & Ring, C. (2016). The moral disengagement in doping scale. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 24, 188-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2016.02.003

Vancouver

Kavussanu M, Hatzigeorgiadis A, Elbe A-M, Ring C. The moral disengagement in doping scale. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2016;24:188-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2016.02.003

Author

Kavussanu, Maria ; Hatzigeorgiadis, Antonis ; Elbe, Anne-Marie ; Ring, Christopher. / The moral disengagement in doping scale. I: Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2016 ; Bind 24. s. 188-198.

Bibtex

@article{58741dd96bb043b4ad252dfcd77765a1,
title = "The moral disengagement in doping scale",
abstract = "Statement of ProblemThe use of banned substances to enhance performance occurs in sport. Therefore, developing valid and reliable instruments that can predict likelihood to use banned substances is important.MethodWe conducted three studies. In Study 1, football players (N = 506) and athletes from a variety of team sports (N = 398) completed the Moral Disengagement in Doping Scale (MDDS). In Study 2, team sport athletes (N = 232) completed the MDDS and questionnaires measuring moral disengagement in sport, doping attitudes, moral identity, antisocial sport behavior, situational doping temptation, and task and ego goal orientations. A week later, a subsample (n = 102) completed the MDDS and indicated their likelihood to use a banned substance in a hypothetical situation. In Study 3, athletes (N = 201) from a variety of individual sports completed the MDDS and indicated their likelihood to use a banned substance in a hypothetical situation.ResultsThe results of Study 1 showed that one-factor model fitted the data well, and the scale showed measurement invariance across males and females. In Study 2, we provided evidence for convergent, concurrent, discriminant, and predictive validity, as well as test-rest reliability, of the scale. In Study 3, doping moral disengagement was positively related with reported likelihood and temptation to use a banned substance. The scale exhibited very good internal consistency across the three studies.ConclusionsIn conclusion, the MDDS can be used to measure moral disengagement in doping in team and individual sports.",
author = "Maria Kavussanu and Antonis Hatzigeorgiadis and Anne-Marie Elbe and Christopher Ring",
note = "CURIS 2016 NEXS 093",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1016/j.psychsport.2016.02.003",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "188--198",
journal = "Psychology of Sport and Exercise",
issn = "1469-0292",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The moral disengagement in doping scale

AU - Kavussanu, Maria

AU - Hatzigeorgiadis, Antonis

AU - Elbe, Anne-Marie

AU - Ring, Christopher

N1 - CURIS 2016 NEXS 093

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Statement of ProblemThe use of banned substances to enhance performance occurs in sport. Therefore, developing valid and reliable instruments that can predict likelihood to use banned substances is important.MethodWe conducted three studies. In Study 1, football players (N = 506) and athletes from a variety of team sports (N = 398) completed the Moral Disengagement in Doping Scale (MDDS). In Study 2, team sport athletes (N = 232) completed the MDDS and questionnaires measuring moral disengagement in sport, doping attitudes, moral identity, antisocial sport behavior, situational doping temptation, and task and ego goal orientations. A week later, a subsample (n = 102) completed the MDDS and indicated their likelihood to use a banned substance in a hypothetical situation. In Study 3, athletes (N = 201) from a variety of individual sports completed the MDDS and indicated their likelihood to use a banned substance in a hypothetical situation.ResultsThe results of Study 1 showed that one-factor model fitted the data well, and the scale showed measurement invariance across males and females. In Study 2, we provided evidence for convergent, concurrent, discriminant, and predictive validity, as well as test-rest reliability, of the scale. In Study 3, doping moral disengagement was positively related with reported likelihood and temptation to use a banned substance. The scale exhibited very good internal consistency across the three studies.ConclusionsIn conclusion, the MDDS can be used to measure moral disengagement in doping in team and individual sports.

AB - Statement of ProblemThe use of banned substances to enhance performance occurs in sport. Therefore, developing valid and reliable instruments that can predict likelihood to use banned substances is important.MethodWe conducted three studies. In Study 1, football players (N = 506) and athletes from a variety of team sports (N = 398) completed the Moral Disengagement in Doping Scale (MDDS). In Study 2, team sport athletes (N = 232) completed the MDDS and questionnaires measuring moral disengagement in sport, doping attitudes, moral identity, antisocial sport behavior, situational doping temptation, and task and ego goal orientations. A week later, a subsample (n = 102) completed the MDDS and indicated their likelihood to use a banned substance in a hypothetical situation. In Study 3, athletes (N = 201) from a variety of individual sports completed the MDDS and indicated their likelihood to use a banned substance in a hypothetical situation.ResultsThe results of Study 1 showed that one-factor model fitted the data well, and the scale showed measurement invariance across males and females. In Study 2, we provided evidence for convergent, concurrent, discriminant, and predictive validity, as well as test-rest reliability, of the scale. In Study 3, doping moral disengagement was positively related with reported likelihood and temptation to use a banned substance. The scale exhibited very good internal consistency across the three studies.ConclusionsIn conclusion, the MDDS can be used to measure moral disengagement in doping in team and individual sports.

U2 - 10.1016/j.psychsport.2016.02.003

DO - 10.1016/j.psychsport.2016.02.003

M3 - Journal article

VL - 24

SP - 188

EP - 198

JO - Psychology of Sport and Exercise

JF - Psychology of Sport and Exercise

SN - 1469-0292

ER -

ID: 156407181