Is a higher protein-lower glycemic index diet more nutritious than a conventional diet? A PREVIEW sub-study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Is a higher protein-lower glycemic index diet more nutritious than a conventional diet? A PREVIEW sub-study. / Meroni, Alice; Muirhead, Roslyn P; Atkinson, Fiona S; Fogelholm, Mikael; Raben, Anne; Brand-Miller, Jennie C.

I: Frontiers in Nutrition, Bind 7, 603801, 2020.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Meroni, A, Muirhead, RP, Atkinson, FS, Fogelholm, M, Raben, A & Brand-Miller, JC 2020, 'Is a higher protein-lower glycemic index diet more nutritious than a conventional diet? A PREVIEW sub-study', Frontiers in Nutrition, bind 7, 603801. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2020.603801

APA

Meroni, A., Muirhead, R. P., Atkinson, F. S., Fogelholm, M., Raben, A., & Brand-Miller, J. C. (2020). Is a higher protein-lower glycemic index diet more nutritious than a conventional diet? A PREVIEW sub-study. Frontiers in Nutrition, 7, [603801]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2020.603801

Vancouver

Meroni A, Muirhead RP, Atkinson FS, Fogelholm M, Raben A, Brand-Miller JC. Is a higher protein-lower glycemic index diet more nutritious than a conventional diet? A PREVIEW sub-study. Frontiers in Nutrition. 2020;7. 603801. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2020.603801

Author

Meroni, Alice ; Muirhead, Roslyn P ; Atkinson, Fiona S ; Fogelholm, Mikael ; Raben, Anne ; Brand-Miller, Jennie C. / Is a higher protein-lower glycemic index diet more nutritious than a conventional diet? A PREVIEW sub-study. I: Frontiers in Nutrition. 2020 ; Bind 7.

Bibtex

@article{63f7e31bc37d4010b77ffa987315a2ac,
title = "Is a higher protein-lower glycemic index diet more nutritious than a conventional diet? A PREVIEW sub-study",
abstract = "High protein diets and low glycemic index (GI) diets have been associated with improved diet quality. We compared the changes in nutrient intakes of individuals at high risk of developing type-2 diabetes over 3 y who followed either a higher protein-lower GI diet (HPLG) or a conventional moderate protein-moderate GI diet (MPMG). This post hoc analysis included 161 participants with overweight and pre-diabetes from the Australian cohort of the PREVIEW study (clinical trial registered in https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01777893?term=NCT01777893&draw=2&rank=1) who were randomly assigned to a HPLG diet (25% energy from protein, dietary GI ≤ 50, n = 85) or a MPMG diet (15% energy from protein, dietary GI ≥ 56, n = 76). Food records were collected at 0-mo (baseline) and at 6-, 12-, 24-, and 36-mo (dietary intervention period). Linear mixed models were used to compare the differences in total energy, macro- and micronutrients, dietary GI, glycemic load (GL) and body weight between the two diet groups at the 4 dietary intervention time points. At 3 y, 74% participants from the HPLG diet and 74% participants from the MPMG diet completed the trial. The HPLG group showed significantly higher protein intake and lower dietary GI and GL than the MPMG group (group fixed effect P < 0.001 for all three parameters). By 6-, 12-, 24-, and 36-mo there was a 3.0, 2.7, 2.2, and 1.4% point difference in protein intake and 6.2, 4.1, 4.8, and 3.9 GI unit difference between the groups. The intake of energy and saturated fat decreased (mostly in the first 6-mo), while the intake of dietary fiber increased (from mo-0 to mo-12 only) in both diets, with no significant differences between the diets. The dietary intakes of zinc (group fixed effect P = 0.05), selenium (P = 0.01), niacin (P = 0.01), vitamin B12 (P = 0.01) and dietary cholesterol (group by time fixed effect P = 0.001) were higher in the HPLG group than in the MPMG group. Despite both diets being designed to be nutritionally complete, a HPLG diet was found to be more nutritious in relation to some micronutrients, but not cholesterol, than a MPMG diet.",
keywords = "Faculty of Science, Zinc, Niacin, Selenium, Vitamin B12, Dietary fiber, Dietary cholesterol, Pre-diabetes",
author = "Alice Meroni and Muirhead, {Roslyn P} and Atkinson, {Fiona S} and Mikael Fogelholm and Anne Raben and Brand-Miller, {Jennie C}",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2020 Meroni, Muirhead, Atkinson, Fogelholm, Raben and Brand-Miller.",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.3389/fnut.2020.603801",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
journal = "Frontiers in Nutrition",
issn = "2296-861X",
publisher = "Frontiers",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is a higher protein-lower glycemic index diet more nutritious than a conventional diet? A PREVIEW sub-study

AU - Meroni, Alice

AU - Muirhead, Roslyn P

AU - Atkinson, Fiona S

AU - Fogelholm, Mikael

AU - Raben, Anne

AU - Brand-Miller, Jennie C

N1 - Copyright © 2020 Meroni, Muirhead, Atkinson, Fogelholm, Raben and Brand-Miller.

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - High protein diets and low glycemic index (GI) diets have been associated with improved diet quality. We compared the changes in nutrient intakes of individuals at high risk of developing type-2 diabetes over 3 y who followed either a higher protein-lower GI diet (HPLG) or a conventional moderate protein-moderate GI diet (MPMG). This post hoc analysis included 161 participants with overweight and pre-diabetes from the Australian cohort of the PREVIEW study (clinical trial registered in https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01777893?term=NCT01777893&draw=2&rank=1) who were randomly assigned to a HPLG diet (25% energy from protein, dietary GI ≤ 50, n = 85) or a MPMG diet (15% energy from protein, dietary GI ≥ 56, n = 76). Food records were collected at 0-mo (baseline) and at 6-, 12-, 24-, and 36-mo (dietary intervention period). Linear mixed models were used to compare the differences in total energy, macro- and micronutrients, dietary GI, glycemic load (GL) and body weight between the two diet groups at the 4 dietary intervention time points. At 3 y, 74% participants from the HPLG diet and 74% participants from the MPMG diet completed the trial. The HPLG group showed significantly higher protein intake and lower dietary GI and GL than the MPMG group (group fixed effect P < 0.001 for all three parameters). By 6-, 12-, 24-, and 36-mo there was a 3.0, 2.7, 2.2, and 1.4% point difference in protein intake and 6.2, 4.1, 4.8, and 3.9 GI unit difference between the groups. The intake of energy and saturated fat decreased (mostly in the first 6-mo), while the intake of dietary fiber increased (from mo-0 to mo-12 only) in both diets, with no significant differences between the diets. The dietary intakes of zinc (group fixed effect P = 0.05), selenium (P = 0.01), niacin (P = 0.01), vitamin B12 (P = 0.01) and dietary cholesterol (group by time fixed effect P = 0.001) were higher in the HPLG group than in the MPMG group. Despite both diets being designed to be nutritionally complete, a HPLG diet was found to be more nutritious in relation to some micronutrients, but not cholesterol, than a MPMG diet.

AB - High protein diets and low glycemic index (GI) diets have been associated with improved diet quality. We compared the changes in nutrient intakes of individuals at high risk of developing type-2 diabetes over 3 y who followed either a higher protein-lower GI diet (HPLG) or a conventional moderate protein-moderate GI diet (MPMG). This post hoc analysis included 161 participants with overweight and pre-diabetes from the Australian cohort of the PREVIEW study (clinical trial registered in https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01777893?term=NCT01777893&draw=2&rank=1) who were randomly assigned to a HPLG diet (25% energy from protein, dietary GI ≤ 50, n = 85) or a MPMG diet (15% energy from protein, dietary GI ≥ 56, n = 76). Food records were collected at 0-mo (baseline) and at 6-, 12-, 24-, and 36-mo (dietary intervention period). Linear mixed models were used to compare the differences in total energy, macro- and micronutrients, dietary GI, glycemic load (GL) and body weight between the two diet groups at the 4 dietary intervention time points. At 3 y, 74% participants from the HPLG diet and 74% participants from the MPMG diet completed the trial. The HPLG group showed significantly higher protein intake and lower dietary GI and GL than the MPMG group (group fixed effect P < 0.001 for all three parameters). By 6-, 12-, 24-, and 36-mo there was a 3.0, 2.7, 2.2, and 1.4% point difference in protein intake and 6.2, 4.1, 4.8, and 3.9 GI unit difference between the groups. The intake of energy and saturated fat decreased (mostly in the first 6-mo), while the intake of dietary fiber increased (from mo-0 to mo-12 only) in both diets, with no significant differences between the diets. The dietary intakes of zinc (group fixed effect P = 0.05), selenium (P = 0.01), niacin (P = 0.01), vitamin B12 (P = 0.01) and dietary cholesterol (group by time fixed effect P = 0.001) were higher in the HPLG group than in the MPMG group. Despite both diets being designed to be nutritionally complete, a HPLG diet was found to be more nutritious in relation to some micronutrients, but not cholesterol, than a MPMG diet.

KW - Faculty of Science

KW - Zinc

KW - Niacin

KW - Selenium

KW - Vitamin B12

KW - Dietary fiber

KW - Dietary cholesterol

KW - Pre-diabetes

U2 - 10.3389/fnut.2020.603801

DO - 10.3389/fnut.2020.603801

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 33365325

VL - 7

JO - Frontiers in Nutrition

JF - Frontiers in Nutrition

SN - 2296-861X

M1 - 603801

ER -

ID: 254469125