Impact of low-volume concurrent strength training distribution on muscular adaptation

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Impact of low-volume concurrent strength training distribution on muscular adaptation. / Kilen, Anders; Bay, Jonathan; Bejder, Jacob; Andersen, Andreas Breenfeldt; Bonne, Thomas Christian; Larsen, Pernille Dyeremose; Carlsen, Andreas; Egelund, Jon; Nybo, Lars; Mackey, Abigail Louise; Olsen, Niels Vidiendal; Aachmann-Andersen, Niels Jacob; Andersen, Jesper Løvind; Nordsborg, Nikolai Baastrup.

I: Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, Bind 23, Nr. 10, 2020, s. 999-1004.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Kilen, A, Bay, J, Bejder, J, Andersen, AB, Bonne, TC, Larsen, PD, Carlsen, A, Egelund, J, Nybo, L, Mackey, AL, Olsen, NV, Aachmann-Andersen, NJ, Andersen, JL & Nordsborg, NB 2020, 'Impact of low-volume concurrent strength training distribution on muscular adaptation', Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, bind 23, nr. 10, s. 999-1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2020.03.013

APA

Kilen, A., Bay, J., Bejder, J., Andersen, A. B., Bonne, T. C., Larsen, P. D., Carlsen, A., Egelund, J., Nybo, L., Mackey, A. L., Olsen, N. V., Aachmann-Andersen, N. J., Andersen, J. L., & Nordsborg, N. B. (2020). Impact of low-volume concurrent strength training distribution on muscular adaptation. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 23(10), 999-1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2020.03.013

Vancouver

Kilen A, Bay J, Bejder J, Andersen AB, Bonne TC, Larsen PD o.a. Impact of low-volume concurrent strength training distribution on muscular adaptation. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2020;23(10):999-1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2020.03.013

Author

Kilen, Anders ; Bay, Jonathan ; Bejder, Jacob ; Andersen, Andreas Breenfeldt ; Bonne, Thomas Christian ; Larsen, Pernille Dyeremose ; Carlsen, Andreas ; Egelund, Jon ; Nybo, Lars ; Mackey, Abigail Louise ; Olsen, Niels Vidiendal ; Aachmann-Andersen, Niels Jacob ; Andersen, Jesper Løvind ; Nordsborg, Nikolai Baastrup. / Impact of low-volume concurrent strength training distribution on muscular adaptation. I: Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2020 ; Bind 23, Nr. 10. s. 999-1004.

Bibtex

@article{c4cfb7c31d664b50a411fbab8f0a476a,
title = "Impact of low-volume concurrent strength training distribution on muscular adaptation",
abstract = "Objectives: Military-, rescue- and law-enforcement personnel require a high physical capacity including muscular strength. The present study hypothesized that 9 weeks of volume matched concurrent short frequent training sessions increases strength more efficiently than less frequent longer training sessions.Design: A randomized training intervention study with functional and physiological tests before and after the intervention.Methods: Military conscripts (n = 290) were assigned to micro-training (four 15-min strength and four 15-min endurance bouts weekly); classical-training (one 60-min strength and one 60-min endurance training session weekly) or a control-group (two 60-min standard military physical training sessions weekly).Results: There were no group difference between micro-training and classical-training in measures of strength. Standing long jump remained similar while shotput performance was reduced (P ≤ 0.001) in all three groups. Pull-up performance increased (P ≤ 0.001) in micro-training (7.4 ± 4.6 vs. 8.5 ± 4.0 repetitions, n = 59) and classical-training (5.7 ± 4.1 vs. 7.1 ± 4.2 repetitions, n = 50). Knee extensor MVC increased (P ≤ 0.01) in all groups (micro-training, n = 30, 11.5 ± 8.9%; classical-training, n = 24, 8.3 ± 11.5% and control, n = 19, 7.5 ± 11.8%) while elbow flexor and hand grip MVC remained similar. Micro-training increased (P ≤ 0.05) type IIa percentage from 32.5 ± 11.0% to 37.6 ± 12.3% (n = 20) and control-group increased (P ≤ 0.01) type IIax from 4.4 ± 3.0% to 11.6 ± 7.9% (n = 8). In control-group type I, fiber size increased (P ≤ 0.05) from 5121 ± 959 μm to 6481 ± 2084 μm (n = 5). Satellite cell content remained similar in all groups.Conclusions: Weekly distribution of low-volume concurrent training completed as either eight 15-min bouts or two 60-min sessions of which 50% was strength training did not impact strength gains in a real-world setting.",
keywords = "Faculty of Science, Muscle biopsies, Military, Muscle fiber composition and size, Satellite cells",
author = "Anders Kilen and Jonathan Bay and Jacob Bejder and Andersen, {Andreas Breenfeldt} and Bonne, {Thomas Christian} and Larsen, {Pernille Dyeremose} and Andreas Carlsen and Jon Egelund and Lars Nybo and Mackey, {Abigail Louise} and Olsen, {Niels Vidiendal} and Aachmann-Andersen, {Niels Jacob} and Andersen, {Jesper L{\o}vind} and Nordsborg, {Nikolai Baastrup}",
note = "CURIS 2020 NEXS 112",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1016/j.jsams.2020.03.013",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "999--1004",
journal = "Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport",
issn = "1440-2440",
publisher = "Elsevier Australia",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of low-volume concurrent strength training distribution on muscular adaptation

AU - Kilen, Anders

AU - Bay, Jonathan

AU - Bejder, Jacob

AU - Andersen, Andreas Breenfeldt

AU - Bonne, Thomas Christian

AU - Larsen, Pernille Dyeremose

AU - Carlsen, Andreas

AU - Egelund, Jon

AU - Nybo, Lars

AU - Mackey, Abigail Louise

AU - Olsen, Niels Vidiendal

AU - Aachmann-Andersen, Niels Jacob

AU - Andersen, Jesper Løvind

AU - Nordsborg, Nikolai Baastrup

N1 - CURIS 2020 NEXS 112

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Objectives: Military-, rescue- and law-enforcement personnel require a high physical capacity including muscular strength. The present study hypothesized that 9 weeks of volume matched concurrent short frequent training sessions increases strength more efficiently than less frequent longer training sessions.Design: A randomized training intervention study with functional and physiological tests before and after the intervention.Methods: Military conscripts (n = 290) were assigned to micro-training (four 15-min strength and four 15-min endurance bouts weekly); classical-training (one 60-min strength and one 60-min endurance training session weekly) or a control-group (two 60-min standard military physical training sessions weekly).Results: There were no group difference between micro-training and classical-training in measures of strength. Standing long jump remained similar while shotput performance was reduced (P ≤ 0.001) in all three groups. Pull-up performance increased (P ≤ 0.001) in micro-training (7.4 ± 4.6 vs. 8.5 ± 4.0 repetitions, n = 59) and classical-training (5.7 ± 4.1 vs. 7.1 ± 4.2 repetitions, n = 50). Knee extensor MVC increased (P ≤ 0.01) in all groups (micro-training, n = 30, 11.5 ± 8.9%; classical-training, n = 24, 8.3 ± 11.5% and control, n = 19, 7.5 ± 11.8%) while elbow flexor and hand grip MVC remained similar. Micro-training increased (P ≤ 0.05) type IIa percentage from 32.5 ± 11.0% to 37.6 ± 12.3% (n = 20) and control-group increased (P ≤ 0.01) type IIax from 4.4 ± 3.0% to 11.6 ± 7.9% (n = 8). In control-group type I, fiber size increased (P ≤ 0.05) from 5121 ± 959 μm to 6481 ± 2084 μm (n = 5). Satellite cell content remained similar in all groups.Conclusions: Weekly distribution of low-volume concurrent training completed as either eight 15-min bouts or two 60-min sessions of which 50% was strength training did not impact strength gains in a real-world setting.

AB - Objectives: Military-, rescue- and law-enforcement personnel require a high physical capacity including muscular strength. The present study hypothesized that 9 weeks of volume matched concurrent short frequent training sessions increases strength more efficiently than less frequent longer training sessions.Design: A randomized training intervention study with functional and physiological tests before and after the intervention.Methods: Military conscripts (n = 290) were assigned to micro-training (four 15-min strength and four 15-min endurance bouts weekly); classical-training (one 60-min strength and one 60-min endurance training session weekly) or a control-group (two 60-min standard military physical training sessions weekly).Results: There were no group difference between micro-training and classical-training in measures of strength. Standing long jump remained similar while shotput performance was reduced (P ≤ 0.001) in all three groups. Pull-up performance increased (P ≤ 0.001) in micro-training (7.4 ± 4.6 vs. 8.5 ± 4.0 repetitions, n = 59) and classical-training (5.7 ± 4.1 vs. 7.1 ± 4.2 repetitions, n = 50). Knee extensor MVC increased (P ≤ 0.01) in all groups (micro-training, n = 30, 11.5 ± 8.9%; classical-training, n = 24, 8.3 ± 11.5% and control, n = 19, 7.5 ± 11.8%) while elbow flexor and hand grip MVC remained similar. Micro-training increased (P ≤ 0.05) type IIa percentage from 32.5 ± 11.0% to 37.6 ± 12.3% (n = 20) and control-group increased (P ≤ 0.01) type IIax from 4.4 ± 3.0% to 11.6 ± 7.9% (n = 8). In control-group type I, fiber size increased (P ≤ 0.05) from 5121 ± 959 μm to 6481 ± 2084 μm (n = 5). Satellite cell content remained similar in all groups.Conclusions: Weekly distribution of low-volume concurrent training completed as either eight 15-min bouts or two 60-min sessions of which 50% was strength training did not impact strength gains in a real-world setting.

KW - Faculty of Science

KW - Muscle biopsies

KW - Military

KW - Muscle fiber composition and size

KW - Satellite cells

U2 - 10.1016/j.jsams.2020.03.013

DO - 10.1016/j.jsams.2020.03.013

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 32371120

VL - 23

SP - 999

EP - 1004

JO - Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

JF - Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

SN - 1440-2440

IS - 10

ER -

ID: 239121821