Comparison of bi- and tri-linear PLS models for variable selection in metabolomic time-series experiments

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Comparison of bi- and tri-linear PLS models for variable selection in metabolomic time-series experiments. / Gao, Qian; Dragsted, Lars Ove; Ebbels, Timothy.

I: Metabolites, Bind 9, Nr. 5, 92, 2019.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Gao, Q, Dragsted, LO & Ebbels, T 2019, 'Comparison of bi- and tri-linear PLS models for variable selection in metabolomic time-series experiments', Metabolites, bind 9, nr. 5, 92. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo9050092

APA

Gao, Q., Dragsted, L. O., & Ebbels, T. (2019). Comparison of bi- and tri-linear PLS models for variable selection in metabolomic time-series experiments. Metabolites, 9(5), [92]. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo9050092

Vancouver

Gao Q, Dragsted LO, Ebbels T. Comparison of bi- and tri-linear PLS models for variable selection in metabolomic time-series experiments. Metabolites. 2019;9(5). 92. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo9050092

Author

Gao, Qian ; Dragsted, Lars Ove ; Ebbels, Timothy. / Comparison of bi- and tri-linear PLS models for variable selection in metabolomic time-series experiments. I: Metabolites. 2019 ; Bind 9, Nr. 5.

Bibtex

@article{aef26ec8f0324993973a5579866b8c17,
title = "Comparison of bi- and tri-linear PLS models for variable selection in metabolomic time-series experiments",
abstract = "Metabolomic studies with a time-series design are widely used for discovery and validation of biomarkers. In such studies, changes of metabolic profiles over time under different conditions (e.g., control and intervention) are compared, and metabolites responding differently between the conditions are identified as putative biomarkers. To incorporate time-series information into the variable (biomarker) selection in partial least squares regression (PLS) models, we created PLS models with different combinations of bilinear/trilinear X and group/time response dummy Y. In total, five PLS models were evaluated on two real datasets, and also on simulated datasets with varying characteristics (number of subjects, number of variables, inter-individual variability, intra-individual variability and number of time points). Variables showing specific temporal patterns observed visually and determined statistically were labelled as discriminating variables. Bootstrapped-VIP scores were calculated for variable selection and the variable selection performance of five PLS models were assessed based on their capacity to correctly select the discriminating variables. The results showed that the bilinear PLS model with group × time response as dummy Y provided the highest recall (true positive rate) of 83-95% with high precision, independent of most characteristics of the datasets. Trilinear PLS models tend to select a small number of variables with high precision but relatively high false negative rate (lower power). They are also less affected by the noise compared to bilinear PLS models. In datasets with high inter-individual variability, bilinear PLS models tend to provide higher recall while trilinear models tend to provide higher precision. Overall, we recommend bilinear PLS with group x time response Y for variable selection applications in metabolomics intervention time series studies.",
keywords = "Faculty of Science, Time series, PLS, NPLS, Variable selection, Bootstrapped-VIP",
author = "Qian Gao and Dragsted, {Lars Ove} and Timothy Ebbels",
note = "CURIS 2019 NEXS 162",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.3390/metabo9050092",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "Metabolites",
issn = "2218-1989",
publisher = "M D P I AG",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of bi- and tri-linear PLS models for variable selection in metabolomic time-series experiments

AU - Gao, Qian

AU - Dragsted, Lars Ove

AU - Ebbels, Timothy

N1 - CURIS 2019 NEXS 162

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Metabolomic studies with a time-series design are widely used for discovery and validation of biomarkers. In such studies, changes of metabolic profiles over time under different conditions (e.g., control and intervention) are compared, and metabolites responding differently between the conditions are identified as putative biomarkers. To incorporate time-series information into the variable (biomarker) selection in partial least squares regression (PLS) models, we created PLS models with different combinations of bilinear/trilinear X and group/time response dummy Y. In total, five PLS models were evaluated on two real datasets, and also on simulated datasets with varying characteristics (number of subjects, number of variables, inter-individual variability, intra-individual variability and number of time points). Variables showing specific temporal patterns observed visually and determined statistically were labelled as discriminating variables. Bootstrapped-VIP scores were calculated for variable selection and the variable selection performance of five PLS models were assessed based on their capacity to correctly select the discriminating variables. The results showed that the bilinear PLS model with group × time response as dummy Y provided the highest recall (true positive rate) of 83-95% with high precision, independent of most characteristics of the datasets. Trilinear PLS models tend to select a small number of variables with high precision but relatively high false negative rate (lower power). They are also less affected by the noise compared to bilinear PLS models. In datasets with high inter-individual variability, bilinear PLS models tend to provide higher recall while trilinear models tend to provide higher precision. Overall, we recommend bilinear PLS with group x time response Y for variable selection applications in metabolomics intervention time series studies.

AB - Metabolomic studies with a time-series design are widely used for discovery and validation of biomarkers. In such studies, changes of metabolic profiles over time under different conditions (e.g., control and intervention) are compared, and metabolites responding differently between the conditions are identified as putative biomarkers. To incorporate time-series information into the variable (biomarker) selection in partial least squares regression (PLS) models, we created PLS models with different combinations of bilinear/trilinear X and group/time response dummy Y. In total, five PLS models were evaluated on two real datasets, and also on simulated datasets with varying characteristics (number of subjects, number of variables, inter-individual variability, intra-individual variability and number of time points). Variables showing specific temporal patterns observed visually and determined statistically were labelled as discriminating variables. Bootstrapped-VIP scores were calculated for variable selection and the variable selection performance of five PLS models were assessed based on their capacity to correctly select the discriminating variables. The results showed that the bilinear PLS model with group × time response as dummy Y provided the highest recall (true positive rate) of 83-95% with high precision, independent of most characteristics of the datasets. Trilinear PLS models tend to select a small number of variables with high precision but relatively high false negative rate (lower power). They are also less affected by the noise compared to bilinear PLS models. In datasets with high inter-individual variability, bilinear PLS models tend to provide higher recall while trilinear models tend to provide higher precision. Overall, we recommend bilinear PLS with group x time response Y for variable selection applications in metabolomics intervention time series studies.

KW - Faculty of Science

KW - Time series

KW - PLS

KW - NPLS

KW - Variable selection

KW - Bootstrapped-VIP

U2 - 10.3390/metabo9050092

DO - 10.3390/metabo9050092

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 31075899

VL - 9

JO - Metabolites

JF - Metabolites

SN - 2218-1989

IS - 5

M1 - 92

ER -

ID: 217937547