Impact of menstrual function on hormonal response to repeated bouts of intense exercise

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Dokumenter

Anna K. Melin, Christian Ritz, Jens Faber, Sven Skouby, Jessica Pingel, Jorunn Sundgot-Borgen, Anders Mikael Sjödin, Åsa B Tornberg

Background: Strenous exercise stimulates the hypothalamic-pituitary (HP) axis in
order to ensure homeostasis and promote anabolism. Furthermore, exercise stimulates a transient increase in the neurotrophin brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) suggested to mediate the anxiolytic effects of exercise. Athletes with secondary functional hypothalamic amenorrhea (FHA) have been reported to have lower BDNF, and a blunted HP axis response to exercise as athletes with overtraining syndrome.

Aim: The aim of the study was to investigate the hormonal and BDNF responses to a two-bout maximal exercise protocol with four hours of recovery in between in FHA and eumenorrheic (EUM) athletes.

Methods: Eumenorrheic (n = 16) and FHA (n = 14) endurance athletes were
recruited from national teams and competitive clubs. Protocols included gynecological examination; body composition (DXA); 7-day assessment of energy availability; blood sampling pre and post the two exercises tests.

Results: There were no differences between groups in hormonal responses to the
first exercise bout. After the second exercise bout IGFBP-3 increased more in FHA compared with EUM athletes (2.1 0.5 vs. 0.6 0.6 mg/L, p = 0.048). There were non-significant trends toward higher increase in IGF-1 (39.3 4.3 vs. 28.0 4.6 mg/L, p = 0.074), BDNF (96.5 22.9 vs. 34.4 23.5 mg/L, p = 0.058), GH to cortisol ratio (0.329 0.010 vs. 0.058 0.010, p = 0.082), and decrease in IGF-1 to IGFBP-3 ratio (􀀀2.04 1.2 vs. 0.92 1.22, p = 0.081) in athletes with FHA compared with EUM athletes. Furthermore, there was a non-significant trend toward a higher increase in prolactin to cortisol ratio in EUM athletes compared with athletes with FHA (0.60 0.15 vs. 0.23 0.15, p = 0.071). No differences in the hormonal or BDNF responses between the two exercise bouts as a result of menstrual function were found.

Conclusion: No major differences in the hormonal or BDNF responses between the two exercise bouts as a result of menstrual function could be detected.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummer942
TidsskriftFrontiers in Physiology
Vol/bind10
Antal sider8
ISSN1664-042X
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2019

Bibliografisk note

CURIS 2019 NEXS 264

Antal downloads er baseret på statistik fra Google Scholar og www.ku.dk


Ingen data tilgængelig

ID: 225553781