A randomised trial comparing weight loss with aerobic exercise in overweight individuals with coronary artery disease: The CUT-IT trial

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

A randomised trial comparing weight loss with aerobic exercise in overweight individuals with coronary artery disease : The CUT-IT trial. / Pedersen, Lene Rørholm Engelbrecht; Olsen, Rasmus H; Jürs, Anders; Astrup, Arne; Chabanova, Elizaveta; Simonsen, Lene; Wisløff, Ulrik; Haugaard, Steen B; Prescott, Eva.

In: European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, Vol. 22, No. 8, 2015, p. 1009-1017.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Pedersen, LRE, Olsen, RH, Jürs, A, Astrup, A, Chabanova, E, Simonsen, L, Wisløff, U, Haugaard, SB & Prescott, E 2015, 'A randomised trial comparing weight loss with aerobic exercise in overweight individuals with coronary artery disease: The CUT-IT trial', European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 1009-1017. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487314545280

APA

Pedersen, L. R. E., Olsen, R. H., Jürs, A., Astrup, A., Chabanova, E., Simonsen, L., Wisløff, U., Haugaard, S. B., & Prescott, E. (2015). A randomised trial comparing weight loss with aerobic exercise in overweight individuals with coronary artery disease: The CUT-IT trial. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 22(8), 1009-1017. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487314545280

Vancouver

Pedersen LRE, Olsen RH, Jürs A, Astrup A, Chabanova E, Simonsen L et al. A randomised trial comparing weight loss with aerobic exercise in overweight individuals with coronary artery disease: The CUT-IT trial. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology. 2015;22(8):1009-1017. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487314545280

Author

Pedersen, Lene Rørholm Engelbrecht ; Olsen, Rasmus H ; Jürs, Anders ; Astrup, Arne ; Chabanova, Elizaveta ; Simonsen, Lene ; Wisløff, Ulrik ; Haugaard, Steen B ; Prescott, Eva. / A randomised trial comparing weight loss with aerobic exercise in overweight individuals with coronary artery disease : The CUT-IT trial. In: European Journal of Preventive Cardiology. 2015 ; Vol. 22, No. 8. pp. 1009-1017.

Bibtex

@article{0f416888524c434a896aa532c890ef12,
title = "A randomised trial comparing weight loss with aerobic exercise in overweight individuals with coronary artery disease: The CUT-IT trial",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare the effect of aerobic interval training (AIT) versus a low energy diet (LED) on physical fitness, body composition, cardiovascular risk factors and symptoms in overweight individuals with coronary artery disease (CAD).METHODS AND DESIGN: Seventy non-diabetic participants with CAD, a BMI>28 kg/m(2) and aged 45 to 75 years were randomised to 12 weeks' AIT at 90% peak heart rate three times a week or LED (800-1000 kcal/day) for 8-10 weeks followed by 2-4 weeks' weight maintenance diet.RESULTS: Twenty-six (74%) AIT and 29 (83%) LED participants completed intervention per protocol. VO2peak (mL/kg fat free mass(0.67)/min) increased by 10.4% (p = 0.002) following AIT, whereas no change was observed after LED (-3.0%, p = 0.095). The LED group lost 10.6% body weight and 26.6% body fat mass (p < 0.001) compared to 1.6% (p = 0.002) and 5.5% (p < 0.001) following AIT. Waist circumference and visceral abdominal fat were reduced by both interventions but were most pronounced following LED (between-group, p < 0.001). Total cholesterol, non-HDL-C and triglycerides decreased significantly in both groups whereas HDL-C and blood pressure were unchanged. Six participants had their antihypertensive treatment reduced following LED (between-group, p = 0.032). Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS), New York Heart Association (NYHA) and anxiety scores were improved, while depressive symptoms remained unchanged. Intention-to-treat analyses including 65 participants (93%) were similar to per protocol analysis.CONCLUSION: Both interventions were feasible and effective in achieving the desired effects. LED was superior in improving body composition and blood pressure, whereas effects on lipids and symptoms were similar in the two groups. Thus, both AIT and LED improve the cardiovascular risk profile in overweight individuals with contemporarily treated CAD.",
author = "Pedersen, {Lene R{\o}rholm Engelbrecht} and Olsen, {Rasmus H} and Anders J{\"u}rs and Arne Astrup and Elizaveta Chabanova and Lene Simonsen and Ulrik Wisl{\o}ff and Haugaard, {Steen B} and Eva Prescott",
note = "CURIS 2015 NEXS 242",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1177/2047487314545280",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "1009--1017",
journal = "European Journal of Preventive Cardiology",
issn = "2047-4873",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A randomised trial comparing weight loss with aerobic exercise in overweight individuals with coronary artery disease

T2 - The CUT-IT trial

AU - Pedersen, Lene Rørholm Engelbrecht

AU - Olsen, Rasmus H

AU - Jürs, Anders

AU - Astrup, Arne

AU - Chabanova, Elizaveta

AU - Simonsen, Lene

AU - Wisløff, Ulrik

AU - Haugaard, Steen B

AU - Prescott, Eva

N1 - CURIS 2015 NEXS 242

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare the effect of aerobic interval training (AIT) versus a low energy diet (LED) on physical fitness, body composition, cardiovascular risk factors and symptoms in overweight individuals with coronary artery disease (CAD).METHODS AND DESIGN: Seventy non-diabetic participants with CAD, a BMI>28 kg/m(2) and aged 45 to 75 years were randomised to 12 weeks' AIT at 90% peak heart rate three times a week or LED (800-1000 kcal/day) for 8-10 weeks followed by 2-4 weeks' weight maintenance diet.RESULTS: Twenty-six (74%) AIT and 29 (83%) LED participants completed intervention per protocol. VO2peak (mL/kg fat free mass(0.67)/min) increased by 10.4% (p = 0.002) following AIT, whereas no change was observed after LED (-3.0%, p = 0.095). The LED group lost 10.6% body weight and 26.6% body fat mass (p < 0.001) compared to 1.6% (p = 0.002) and 5.5% (p < 0.001) following AIT. Waist circumference and visceral abdominal fat were reduced by both interventions but were most pronounced following LED (between-group, p < 0.001). Total cholesterol, non-HDL-C and triglycerides decreased significantly in both groups whereas HDL-C and blood pressure were unchanged. Six participants had their antihypertensive treatment reduced following LED (between-group, p = 0.032). Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS), New York Heart Association (NYHA) and anxiety scores were improved, while depressive symptoms remained unchanged. Intention-to-treat analyses including 65 participants (93%) were similar to per protocol analysis.CONCLUSION: Both interventions were feasible and effective in achieving the desired effects. LED was superior in improving body composition and blood pressure, whereas effects on lipids and symptoms were similar in the two groups. Thus, both AIT and LED improve the cardiovascular risk profile in overweight individuals with contemporarily treated CAD.

AB - BACKGROUND: We aimed to compare the effect of aerobic interval training (AIT) versus a low energy diet (LED) on physical fitness, body composition, cardiovascular risk factors and symptoms in overweight individuals with coronary artery disease (CAD).METHODS AND DESIGN: Seventy non-diabetic participants with CAD, a BMI>28 kg/m(2) and aged 45 to 75 years were randomised to 12 weeks' AIT at 90% peak heart rate three times a week or LED (800-1000 kcal/day) for 8-10 weeks followed by 2-4 weeks' weight maintenance diet.RESULTS: Twenty-six (74%) AIT and 29 (83%) LED participants completed intervention per protocol. VO2peak (mL/kg fat free mass(0.67)/min) increased by 10.4% (p = 0.002) following AIT, whereas no change was observed after LED (-3.0%, p = 0.095). The LED group lost 10.6% body weight and 26.6% body fat mass (p < 0.001) compared to 1.6% (p = 0.002) and 5.5% (p < 0.001) following AIT. Waist circumference and visceral abdominal fat were reduced by both interventions but were most pronounced following LED (between-group, p < 0.001). Total cholesterol, non-HDL-C and triglycerides decreased significantly in both groups whereas HDL-C and blood pressure were unchanged. Six participants had their antihypertensive treatment reduced following LED (between-group, p = 0.032). Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS), New York Heart Association (NYHA) and anxiety scores were improved, while depressive symptoms remained unchanged. Intention-to-treat analyses including 65 participants (93%) were similar to per protocol analysis.CONCLUSION: Both interventions were feasible and effective in achieving the desired effects. LED was superior in improving body composition and blood pressure, whereas effects on lipids and symptoms were similar in the two groups. Thus, both AIT and LED improve the cardiovascular risk profile in overweight individuals with contemporarily treated CAD.

U2 - 10.1177/2047487314545280

DO - 10.1177/2047487314545280

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 25082954

VL - 22

SP - 1009

EP - 1017

JO - European Journal of Preventive Cardiology

JF - European Journal of Preventive Cardiology

SN - 2047-4873

IS - 8

ER -

ID: 120066137