Short- or long-rest intervals during repeated-sprint training in soccer?

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelfagfællebedømt

Standard

Short- or long-rest intervals during repeated-sprint training in soccer? / Iaia, F Marcello; Fiorenza, Matteo; Larghi, Luca; Alberti, Giampietro; Millet, Grégoire P; Girard, Olivier.

I: P L o S One, Bind 12, Nr. 2, e0171462, 2017.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Iaia, FM, Fiorenza, M, Larghi, L, Alberti, G, Millet, GP & Girard, O 2017, 'Short- or long-rest intervals during repeated-sprint training in soccer?', P L o S One, bind 12, nr. 2, e0171462. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171462

APA

Iaia, F. M., Fiorenza, M., Larghi, L., Alberti, G., Millet, G. P., & Girard, O. (2017). Short- or long-rest intervals during repeated-sprint training in soccer? P L o S One, 12(2), [e0171462]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171462

Vancouver

Iaia FM, Fiorenza M, Larghi L, Alberti G, Millet GP, Girard O. Short- or long-rest intervals during repeated-sprint training in soccer? P L o S One. 2017;12(2). e0171462. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171462

Author

Iaia, F Marcello ; Fiorenza, Matteo ; Larghi, Luca ; Alberti, Giampietro ; Millet, Grégoire P ; Girard, Olivier. / Short- or long-rest intervals during repeated-sprint training in soccer?. I: P L o S One. 2017 ; Bind 12, Nr. 2.

Bibtex

@article{4e9ef5875ebf40bf81a44a34be850b8e,
title = "Short- or long-rest intervals during repeated-sprint training in soccer?",
abstract = "The present study compared the effects of two repeated-sprint training (RST) programs, differing in duration of the between-sprint rest intervals, on various soccer-related exercise performances. For 5 weeks during the competitive season, twenty-nine young trained male soccer players either replaced two of their habitual fitness conditioning sessions with RST characterized by short (5-15; n = 9) or long (5-30; n = 10) rest intervals, or served as control (n = 10). The 5-15 and 5-30 protocols consisted of 6 repetitions of 30-m (∼5 s) straight-line sprints interspersed with 15 s or 30 s of passive recovery, respectively. 5-15 improved 200-m sprint time (2.0±1.5%; p<0.05) and had a likely positive impact on 20-m sprint performance, whereas 5-30 lowered the 20-m sprint time (2.7±1.6%; p<0.05) but was only possibly effective for enhancing the 200-m sprint performance. The distance covered during the Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test Level 2 increased following 5-15 (11.4±5.0%; p<0.05), which was possibly better than the non-significant 6.5% enhancement observed in 5-30. Improvements in the total time of a repeated-sprint ability test were possibly greater following 5-30 (3.6±0.9%; p<0.05) compared to 5-15 (2.6±1.1%; p<0.05). Both RST interventions led to similar beneficial (p<0.05) reductions in the percentage decrement score (∼30%) of the repeated-sprint ability test as well as in blood lactate concentration during submaximal exercise (17±18%). No changes occurred in the control group. In soccer players, RST over a 5-week in-season period is an efficient means to simultaneously develop different components of fitness relevant to match performance, with different benefits induced by shorter compared to longer rest intervals.",
author = "Iaia, {F Marcello} and Matteo Fiorenza and Luca Larghi and Giampietro Alberti and Millet, {Gr{\'e}goire P} and Olivier Girard",
note = "CURIS 2017 NEXS 392",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0171462",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
journal = "PLoS ONE",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Short- or long-rest intervals during repeated-sprint training in soccer?

AU - Iaia, F Marcello

AU - Fiorenza, Matteo

AU - Larghi, Luca

AU - Alberti, Giampietro

AU - Millet, Grégoire P

AU - Girard, Olivier

N1 - CURIS 2017 NEXS 392

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - The present study compared the effects of two repeated-sprint training (RST) programs, differing in duration of the between-sprint rest intervals, on various soccer-related exercise performances. For 5 weeks during the competitive season, twenty-nine young trained male soccer players either replaced two of their habitual fitness conditioning sessions with RST characterized by short (5-15; n = 9) or long (5-30; n = 10) rest intervals, or served as control (n = 10). The 5-15 and 5-30 protocols consisted of 6 repetitions of 30-m (∼5 s) straight-line sprints interspersed with 15 s or 30 s of passive recovery, respectively. 5-15 improved 200-m sprint time (2.0±1.5%; p<0.05) and had a likely positive impact on 20-m sprint performance, whereas 5-30 lowered the 20-m sprint time (2.7±1.6%; p<0.05) but was only possibly effective for enhancing the 200-m sprint performance. The distance covered during the Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test Level 2 increased following 5-15 (11.4±5.0%; p<0.05), which was possibly better than the non-significant 6.5% enhancement observed in 5-30. Improvements in the total time of a repeated-sprint ability test were possibly greater following 5-30 (3.6±0.9%; p<0.05) compared to 5-15 (2.6±1.1%; p<0.05). Both RST interventions led to similar beneficial (p<0.05) reductions in the percentage decrement score (∼30%) of the repeated-sprint ability test as well as in blood lactate concentration during submaximal exercise (17±18%). No changes occurred in the control group. In soccer players, RST over a 5-week in-season period is an efficient means to simultaneously develop different components of fitness relevant to match performance, with different benefits induced by shorter compared to longer rest intervals.

AB - The present study compared the effects of two repeated-sprint training (RST) programs, differing in duration of the between-sprint rest intervals, on various soccer-related exercise performances. For 5 weeks during the competitive season, twenty-nine young trained male soccer players either replaced two of their habitual fitness conditioning sessions with RST characterized by short (5-15; n = 9) or long (5-30; n = 10) rest intervals, or served as control (n = 10). The 5-15 and 5-30 protocols consisted of 6 repetitions of 30-m (∼5 s) straight-line sprints interspersed with 15 s or 30 s of passive recovery, respectively. 5-15 improved 200-m sprint time (2.0±1.5%; p<0.05) and had a likely positive impact on 20-m sprint performance, whereas 5-30 lowered the 20-m sprint time (2.7±1.6%; p<0.05) but was only possibly effective for enhancing the 200-m sprint performance. The distance covered during the Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test Level 2 increased following 5-15 (11.4±5.0%; p<0.05), which was possibly better than the non-significant 6.5% enhancement observed in 5-30. Improvements in the total time of a repeated-sprint ability test were possibly greater following 5-30 (3.6±0.9%; p<0.05) compared to 5-15 (2.6±1.1%; p<0.05). Both RST interventions led to similar beneficial (p<0.05) reductions in the percentage decrement score (∼30%) of the repeated-sprint ability test as well as in blood lactate concentration during submaximal exercise (17±18%). No changes occurred in the control group. In soccer players, RST over a 5-week in-season period is an efficient means to simultaneously develop different components of fitness relevant to match performance, with different benefits induced by shorter compared to longer rest intervals.

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0171462

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0171462

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 28199402

AN - SCOPUS:85012950159

VL - 12

JO - PLoS ONE

JF - PLoS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 2

M1 - e0171462

ER -

ID: 214393363