High-intensity training vs. traditional exercise interventions for promoting health

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelfagfællebedømt

Standard

High-intensity training vs. traditional exercise interventions for promoting health. / Nybo, Lars; Sundstrup, Emil; Jakobsen, Markus D.; Mohr, Magni; Hornstrup, Therese; Simonsen, Lene; Bülow, Jens; Randers, Morten Bredsgaard; Nielsen, Jens Jung; Aagaard, Per; Krustrup, Peter.

I: Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, Bind 42, Nr. 10, 2010, s. 1951-1958.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Nybo, L, Sundstrup, E, Jakobsen, MD, Mohr, M, Hornstrup, T, Simonsen, L, Bülow, J, Randers, MB, Nielsen, JJ, Aagaard, P & Krustrup, P 2010, 'High-intensity training vs. traditional exercise interventions for promoting health', Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, bind 42, nr. 10, s. 1951-1958. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181d99203

APA

Nybo, L., Sundstrup, E., Jakobsen, M. D., Mohr, M., Hornstrup, T., Simonsen, L., Bülow, J., Randers, M. B., Nielsen, J. J., Aagaard, P., & Krustrup, P. (2010). High-intensity training vs. traditional exercise interventions for promoting health. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 42(10), 1951-1958. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181d99203

Vancouver

Nybo L, Sundstrup E, Jakobsen MD, Mohr M, Hornstrup T, Simonsen L o.a. High-intensity training vs. traditional exercise interventions for promoting health. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2010;42(10):1951-1958. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181d99203

Author

Nybo, Lars ; Sundstrup, Emil ; Jakobsen, Markus D. ; Mohr, Magni ; Hornstrup, Therese ; Simonsen, Lene ; Bülow, Jens ; Randers, Morten Bredsgaard ; Nielsen, Jens Jung ; Aagaard, Per ; Krustrup, Peter. / High-intensity training vs. traditional exercise interventions for promoting health. I: Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2010 ; Bind 42, Nr. 10. s. 1951-1958.

Bibtex

@article{f7ab4960284011df8ed1000ea68e967b,
title = "High-intensity training vs. traditional exercise interventions for promoting health",
abstract = "PURPOSE:: to determine the effectiveness of brief intense interval training as exercise intervention for promoting health and evaluate potential benefits with reference to common interventions; i.e. prolonged exercise and strength training. METHODS:: 36 untrained men were divided into groups that completed 12 weeks of intense interval running (INT; total training time 40 min a week), prolonged running ( approximately 150 min/week), strength training ( approximately 150 min/week) or continued their habitual life-style without participation in physical training. RESULTS:: The improvement in cardiorespiratory fitness was superior in INT (14+/-2% increase in VO2max) compared to the other two exercise interventions (7+/-2% and 3+/-2% increases). The blood glucose concentration 2 hours following oral ingestion of 75 g of glucose was lowered to a similar extent following training in the INT (from 6.1+/-0.6 to 5.1+/-0.4 mM; P<0.05) and the prolonged running group (from 5.6 +/-1.5 to 4.9+/-1.1 mM; P<0.05). In contrast, INT was less efficient than prolonged running for lowering the subjects resting heart rate, fat percentage and reducing the ratio between total and HDL plasma cholesterol. Furthermore, total bone mass and lean body mass remained unchanged in the INT group, while both these parameters were increased by the strength training intervention. CONCLUSIONS:: INT for 12 weeks is an effective training stimulus for improvement of cardiorespiratory fitness and glucose tolerance, but in relation to the treatment of hyperlipidemia and obesity it is less effective than prolonged training. Furthermore and in contrast to strength training, 12 weeks of INT had no impact on muscle mass or indices of skeletal health.",
author = "Lars Nybo and Emil Sundstrup and Jakobsen, {Markus D.} and Magni Mohr and Therese Hornstrup and Lene Simonsen and Jens B{\"u}low and Randers, {Morten Bredsgaard} and Nielsen, {Jens Jung} and Per Aagaard and Peter Krustrup",
note = "CURIS 2010 5200 027",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181d99203",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "1951--1958",
journal = "Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise",
issn = "0195-9131",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams & Wilkins",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - High-intensity training vs. traditional exercise interventions for promoting health

AU - Nybo, Lars

AU - Sundstrup, Emil

AU - Jakobsen, Markus D.

AU - Mohr, Magni

AU - Hornstrup, Therese

AU - Simonsen, Lene

AU - Bülow, Jens

AU - Randers, Morten Bredsgaard

AU - Nielsen, Jens Jung

AU - Aagaard, Per

AU - Krustrup, Peter

N1 - CURIS 2010 5200 027

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - PURPOSE:: to determine the effectiveness of brief intense interval training as exercise intervention for promoting health and evaluate potential benefits with reference to common interventions; i.e. prolonged exercise and strength training. METHODS:: 36 untrained men were divided into groups that completed 12 weeks of intense interval running (INT; total training time 40 min a week), prolonged running ( approximately 150 min/week), strength training ( approximately 150 min/week) or continued their habitual life-style without participation in physical training. RESULTS:: The improvement in cardiorespiratory fitness was superior in INT (14+/-2% increase in VO2max) compared to the other two exercise interventions (7+/-2% and 3+/-2% increases). The blood glucose concentration 2 hours following oral ingestion of 75 g of glucose was lowered to a similar extent following training in the INT (from 6.1+/-0.6 to 5.1+/-0.4 mM; P<0.05) and the prolonged running group (from 5.6 +/-1.5 to 4.9+/-1.1 mM; P<0.05). In contrast, INT was less efficient than prolonged running for lowering the subjects resting heart rate, fat percentage and reducing the ratio between total and HDL plasma cholesterol. Furthermore, total bone mass and lean body mass remained unchanged in the INT group, while both these parameters were increased by the strength training intervention. CONCLUSIONS:: INT for 12 weeks is an effective training stimulus for improvement of cardiorespiratory fitness and glucose tolerance, but in relation to the treatment of hyperlipidemia and obesity it is less effective than prolonged training. Furthermore and in contrast to strength training, 12 weeks of INT had no impact on muscle mass or indices of skeletal health.

AB - PURPOSE:: to determine the effectiveness of brief intense interval training as exercise intervention for promoting health and evaluate potential benefits with reference to common interventions; i.e. prolonged exercise and strength training. METHODS:: 36 untrained men were divided into groups that completed 12 weeks of intense interval running (INT; total training time 40 min a week), prolonged running ( approximately 150 min/week), strength training ( approximately 150 min/week) or continued their habitual life-style without participation in physical training. RESULTS:: The improvement in cardiorespiratory fitness was superior in INT (14+/-2% increase in VO2max) compared to the other two exercise interventions (7+/-2% and 3+/-2% increases). The blood glucose concentration 2 hours following oral ingestion of 75 g of glucose was lowered to a similar extent following training in the INT (from 6.1+/-0.6 to 5.1+/-0.4 mM; P<0.05) and the prolonged running group (from 5.6 +/-1.5 to 4.9+/-1.1 mM; P<0.05). In contrast, INT was less efficient than prolonged running for lowering the subjects resting heart rate, fat percentage and reducing the ratio between total and HDL plasma cholesterol. Furthermore, total bone mass and lean body mass remained unchanged in the INT group, while both these parameters were increased by the strength training intervention. CONCLUSIONS:: INT for 12 weeks is an effective training stimulus for improvement of cardiorespiratory fitness and glucose tolerance, but in relation to the treatment of hyperlipidemia and obesity it is less effective than prolonged training. Furthermore and in contrast to strength training, 12 weeks of INT had no impact on muscle mass or indices of skeletal health.

U2 - 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181d99203

DO - 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181d99203

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 20195181

VL - 42

SP - 1951

EP - 1958

JO - Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise

JF - Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise

SN - 0195-9131

IS - 10

ER -

ID: 18389076